Message from @redd

Discord ID: 430548835039838249


2018-04-03 02:04:18 UTC  

gay so pretty fem, jk they are still men

2018-04-03 02:04:37 UTC  

They can sympathise with girls then, other than periods

2018-04-03 02:04:41 UTC  

Fucking soy boys

2018-04-03 02:04:51 UTC  

<:angrypepe:425095109940346890>

2018-04-03 02:04:52 UTC  

Because women aren't a different species. I don't expect it would be terribly different from daughters raised by single fathers. Not ideal, but not worth denying rights to anyone.

2018-04-03 02:05:11 UTC  

@radeon So you're not a gender realist?

2018-04-03 02:05:13 UTC  

also two dudes don't just get a kid because they want one. people dont have rights to children in that way

2018-04-03 02:05:23 UTC  

I think you are denying the reality of gender based parenting

2018-04-03 02:05:27 UTC  

not all gays are overtly immasculine, me for instance

2018-04-03 02:05:39 UTC  

Furry tho

2018-04-03 02:05:44 UTC  

no, but you are a furry

2018-04-03 02:05:54 UTC  

yeah no furry should be allowed within 100m of children

2018-04-03 02:05:57 UTC  

@radeon sounds like you're a post-mdernist shill

2018-04-03 02:06:05 UTC  

<:pedobear:371557062850904064> in a suit

2018-04-03 02:06:12 UTC  

If my father were a furry, I'd off myself

2018-04-03 02:06:15 UTC  

I'm a gender realist but that doesn't mean I would deny people the ability to have a family simply because it's not in an ideal situation.

2018-04-03 02:06:39 UTC  

but they dont have a right to a family if they cant produce their own children

2018-04-03 02:06:45 UTC  

@radeon You make it seem like there AREN'T other, better family situations for these kids

2018-04-03 02:06:47 UTC  

Nobody answered my question, which is preferable, gay parents or no parents?

2018-04-03 02:07:19 UTC  

As it is we have far more foster kids than we do married gay couples

2018-04-03 02:07:21 UTC  

what do you guys think of those degenerates who got `U` put on their child's birth cert.? This is lgbt bollocks to the extreme

2018-04-03 02:07:26 UTC  

@Deleted User ... so infertile women shouldnt be able to adopt?

2018-04-03 02:07:33 UTC  

@radeon And why is that? Go look it up.

2018-04-03 02:07:44 UTC  

The adoption system in the US is rigged as hell

2018-04-03 02:07:54 UTC  

Yea

2018-04-03 02:07:54 UTC  

@NightOwl she should be able to if she is with a man who will stay with her for the next 15-20 years

2018-04-03 02:08:11 UTC  

they can, but they dont have a right to it like free speech

2018-04-03 02:08:22 UTC  

That seems awfully arbitrarily @redd

2018-04-03 02:08:57 UTC  

It's arbitrary to require that the adoptive family be a solid one?

2018-04-03 02:08:58 UTC  

Also why do you think you or anyone else should have the ability to decide who gets to have a family or not?

2018-04-03 02:09:06 UTC  

@radeon oh yes, it is not a practical law because you can't prove that a couple will stay together, but it is a system you could use prediction with

2018-04-03 02:09:09 UTC  

adoption is for the child, not because "I wanna be a mommy, I demand a baby"

2018-04-03 02:09:24 UTC  

gimme a child <:pedobear:371557062850904064>

2018-04-03 02:09:36 UTC  

Sure but would you rather a kid go to two middle class gay men or to two hetero junkies?

2018-04-03 02:09:37 UTC  

I was gonna say they already deny people children 🤔

2018-04-03 02:09:42 UTC  

yeah

2018-04-03 02:09:54 UTC  

It is not a right

2018-04-03 02:09:56 UTC  

Nice talkin guys, I'm out of this utter cancer

2018-04-03 02:10:00 UTC  

those questions are just silly radeon

2018-04-03 02:10:04 UTC  

@Deleted User They deny good people the ability to adopt

2018-04-03 02:10:20 UTC  

No it isn't a right however I don't see a liberal argument for denying it to gay people.