Message from @M4Gunner
Discord ID: 438322467354837002
8 fucking months for fliping off a camera. That should be a slap on the wrists offense at best.
i thought the charge was for the jammer
Oh
Well yeah
its similar to punishment youd get in USA
Oregon: `` not more than $10,000 or by imprisonment for a term not exceeding one year``
Don't they use radars in speed cameras?
?
It's the snarky tone of the Tweet
OP's wallet says ``BAD MOTHER FUCKER``
Is Top tip like PROTIP in UK?
yeah
"We are watching."
Who watches the BullyHunters?
It still exist?
I thought they shut it down after the first episode
The site doesn't exist anymore
The ultimate hunt is to hunt the Hunter
No bully
ples
Does anyone know whether Dankula is appealing or did the judge refuse the right to appeal?
Just checked, the judge denied appeal
I am slightly worried how this is turning out, there has been no comment whatsoever from the judiciary either in support or condemnation
Meaning they don't even care enough to comment
He cant even appeal
The absolute state of the UK
if it goes over well, they can give the same fine to anyone
How can they deny his right to appeal?
Defaq?
Wow, a Lain reference. Haven't seen one in years
am a big fan
What's the point of having the option to appeal if your current judge can just take it away from you?
under what grounds can they deny right to appeal?
"If you do not win your case, there is usually a right to apply for the decision of the court to be reviewed by a higher court and possibly be quashed. Such a right, however, is not automatic. There must be proper grounds for making an appeal and there are strict time limits within which to do so. There must be substantial procedural or other irregularity which will give rise to appeal. The aim of an appeal is to correct a wrong decision and so avoid a miscarriage of justice.
An appeal must be allowed by a court. It is therefore necessary to prove that there was some kind of misunderstanding of the law, evidence or facts. Sometimes one of the parties obtains fresh evidence; this is not normally allowed by an appeal court, but if the party can show that this fresh evidence was relevant and credible but not possible to be obtained for the hearing at a lower court, it will be allowed."
https://www.inbrief.co.uk/court-judgements/right-to-appeal/
As far as taking away right to appeal, I can't find anything regarding that. So someone actually from the UK would have to address that
I guess that you dont automatically have the right
You have to prove some sort of wrongdoing it would seem
Which in Dank's case would mean the appeals judge would need to see what the judge did as wrongdoing
thx
it seems in US there is no automatic right either, the courts must grant your hearing