Message from @Baraban
Discord ID: 438332498275991562
I guess that you dont automatically have the right
You have to prove some sort of wrongdoing it would seem
Which in Dank's case would mean the appeals judge would need to see what the judge did as wrongdoing
thx
it seems in US there is no automatic right either, the courts must grant your hearing
I think you have the automatic right to submit an appeal, but the actual hearing needs to be approved. Which is fair I'd say
is there any video or trascript of the actual hearing? all ive seen is stuff from outside the building
right, my language for describing this sucks
I'm not sure. I would think so but I don't know if that kind of footage is public access
can't find anything but snippets so far
but this is good
http://barristerblogger.com/2018/03/24/its-time-to-change-the-bad-law-used-to-prosecute-count-dankula/
it says the OG law re: ``127 Improper use of public electronic communications network`` was used to protect from hoax telegrams and harrassment of female telephonists, (IE operators i'm assuming)
The writer is certainly no fan of Dank's humor
Which is often the best person to have defending you
That comes out a lot in the comments of articles too, lots of people saying "he's a cretin but I disagree with the ruling"
Good morning
Morning
Good after noon
I don't think he's as hilarious as his dog is cute
How do you say goodmorning in Hebrew ?
בוקר טוב
Yes that
The problem really *is* the vagueness of this law -.-
Comms Act 2003
SS127 (1):(1)A person is guilty of an offence if he—
(a)sends by means of a public electronic communications network a message or other matter that is grossly offensive or of an indecent, obscene or menacing character; or
(b)causes any such message or matter to be so sent.
How was I supposed to understand that ?
Understand what?
The one agenten sent
I wrote it with English letters
It’s literally in Hebrew
I know, I saw yours
If you were to google it you could probably find an english translation
I can’t do that.
copy-paste
"I can't be asked to do that."
It would say "בוקר טוב"
That's the problem of leaving subjective criteria in the law.
Same way as if I were to say Доброе утро
(Dobraye ootro) Good morning
how can you expect to understand the answer when you ask for it in another language ?? 😄
Well