Message from @Jab

Discord ID: 439383537955897344


2018-04-27 11:03:53 UTC  

It isn't to dismiss them entirely. I just don't see their model working in the long run for the moment.

2018-04-27 11:04:41 UTC  

It's going to be interesting to see how they transform though.

2018-04-27 11:04:59 UTC  

If your model only reacts to your competitors, then you aren't steering the market.

2018-04-27 11:06:26 UTC  

There's also the much bigger problem to face: People on average don't care enough about free speech to go in and write their own censor lists.

2018-04-27 11:06:36 UTC  

People have been trained to have the big guys censor for them.

2018-04-27 11:07:46 UTC  

The current model right now is a Free-For-All anti-censorship campaign.

2018-04-27 11:07:56 UTC  

i don't think people are incapable of writing censor lists

2018-04-27 11:08:06 UTC  

They aren't, but it isn't exactly a sales pitch.

2018-04-27 11:08:41 UTC  

I think if Gab provided pre-made lists for people to apply, that's fix a lot of that issue.

2018-04-27 11:08:51 UTC  

the main problem with the censor lists is that I've people remove words like kike and jew from their posts entirely and only link to like daily stormer articles to avoid the censor list

2018-04-27 11:09:09 UTC  

Yeah it becomes a race

2018-04-27 11:09:31 UTC  

Gab is a platform of principle, if you give away pre-made lists you're already not being neutral anymore

2018-04-27 11:09:48 UTC  

And that's the problem.

2018-04-27 11:09:56 UTC  

I don't mind if there's the option to censor for others.

2018-04-27 11:09:59 UTC  

I can handle quite a bit.

2018-04-27 11:10:05 UTC  

I don't expect this for others.

2018-04-27 11:10:28 UTC  

I feel like gab is a reaction to social media censorship, and has corned themselves in terms of business strategy to attract new users.

2018-04-27 11:11:00 UTC  

Not everyone cares about free speech, as much as I'd hate to say it.

2018-04-27 11:11:57 UTC  

Again, it will be interesting to see how Gab evolves.

2018-04-27 11:13:02 UTC  

I don't have to support a business just because it agrees with my views, and I can support a business that doesn't support my views on principle of acceptable business by the laws of the land.

2018-04-27 11:13:18 UTC  

Convenience vs Principle

2018-04-27 11:13:24 UTC  

people often choose the former.

2018-04-27 11:13:55 UTC  

It's going to be one hell of an up-hill battle for Gab.

2018-04-27 11:14:22 UTC  

I think the censor lists will not be as huge an obstacle as one would think

2018-04-27 11:14:47 UTC  

And I think the hot topics provide an incredibly engaging way to entice people to voice themselves in ways twitter doesn't have

2018-04-27 11:15:05 UTC  

but whether gab ever takes off into the mainstream is another question entirely

not until Twitter bans Trump

2018-04-27 11:15:36 UTC  

I don't think gab is less convenient than twitter to be honest apart from the censor lists

2018-04-27 11:15:43 UTC  

twitter ban trump pls

2018-04-27 11:15:54 UTC  

if they offer only free speech they will be stigmatized as alt-white regurgitation chambers

2018-04-27 11:16:09 UTC  

need some groundbreaking new QOL feature

2018-04-27 11:16:25 UTC  

trump got stigmatized as an alt-white regurgitation chamber and look where that got him <:pepe_smug:378719408341909506>

Twitter banning Trump is the same as reddit deleting T_D

2018-04-27 11:16:45 UTC  

I'm just saying less people will be attracted to it

a shitstorm bigger than a nuke

2018-04-27 11:17:19 UTC  

a nothing platform doesnt have Trump's draw

2018-04-27 11:17:41 UTC  

now if they get him to switch, theyre money

Trump switching would probs crash GAB anyway

2018-04-27 11:18:05 UTC  

Trump could easily just shitpost to his own website someone could code for him for 35 dollars

2018-04-27 11:18:22 UTC  

Gab needs to think more about organic growth.

2018-04-27 11:18:38 UTC  

Ive only really looked at Minds.com so far