Message from @EmptyE
Discord ID: 446265880855445504
At least in europe
I mean, this seems clearly to be a 'should' question, Whats the practical limitations got to do with any of it?
Kk thanks @franti
In regards to whether the goals are 'good' yeah
Thats a should a question
bit dull but sure
I have problems with implementation
who doesn't?
Implementation issues can't refute an ideal theory though
Which Ethno-nationalism is
So is socialism
Agreed
whats your point?
Look at the world for what it is, not what you would like it to be
because idealists will still cling to it and feel they win if you just keep saying "Ah but it will never work"
because such a response suggests that what they are after WOULD be good, IFF it could be realised
It works fine when married with Capitalism
That would require also free trade
And they are protectionists
And also want to nationalise industries
Some industries work better nationalised
Example: Rail
That's not ethnic nationalism though
yeah but you aren't answering any of the follow ups
You will let foreigners own land in your country then?
Right wing authoritarian ethnic nationalists are for such policies
Ethnic nationalism would also imply natives owning the land
not you guys, Rusky
Will you let international investors own farmland, factories and small shops?
Sure as long as they don't permanently live here
And then you will have your purity spiral
Because some want no foreigners owning property in your state
If the property brings in money why get rid of it , especially if it's benefitting the country
I am having an odd sense of dejavu
It really never sounded good
No idea why people say that
because 'equality' is a word with good value propositions?
yes