Then let me rephrase it, removing people that are not of your country's ethnicity

And?

How about not, I live in Slovakia and I dont my property to be confiscated because I am ethnically Hungarian

I see

Also this is a road to war

At least in europe

I mean, this seems clearly to be a 'should' question, Whats the practical limitations got to do with any of it?

Kk thanks @franti

Do you employ this same line of thought towards socialism? @EmptyE

In regards to whether the goals are 'good' yeah

Thats a should a question

bit dull but sure

I have problems with implementation

who doesn't?

Implementation issues can't refute an ideal theory though

Which Ethno-nationalism is

So is socialism

Agreed

whats your point?

Look at the world for what it is, not what you would like it to be

because idealists will still cling to it and feel they win if you just keep saying "Ah but it will never work"

because such a response suggests that what they are after WOULD be good, IFF it could be realised

It works fine when married with Capitalism

That would require also free trade

And they are protectionists

who?

And also want to nationalise industries

Some industries work better nationalised

Example: Rail

That's not ethnic nationalism though

yeah but you aren't answering any of the follow ups

You will let foreigners own land in your country then?

Right wing authoritarian ethnic nationalists are for such policies

Ethnic nationalism would also imply natives owning the land

not you guys, Rusky

Will you let international investors own farmland, factories and small shops?

Sure as long as they don't permanently live here

And then you will have your purity spiral

Because some want no foreigners owning property in your state

If the property brings in money why get rid of it , especially if it's benefitting the country

I am having an odd sense of dejavu