Message from @Mercury

Discord ID: 453342972457779221


2018-06-04 23:39:34 UTC  

Here

2018-06-04 23:39:43 UTC  

For your ass

2018-06-04 23:39:44 UTC  

Okay What is a meta political document?

2018-06-04 23:39:53 UTC  

It’s the big gay

2018-06-04 23:40:01 UTC  

@Deleted User Don't worry. You're just presenting something very alien to people. You gotta have patience.

2018-06-04 23:40:02 UTC  

Can fascists have a constitutional document? You guys are too much

2018-06-04 23:40:03 UTC  

lol

2018-06-04 23:40:33 UTC  

true

2018-06-04 23:41:19 UTC  

Theyre not putting into vision a political ideaology, it would have a set of laws and principles....like any state

2018-06-04 23:41:38 UTC  

Ours would have more social codes....

2018-06-04 23:41:47 UTC  

perhaps even ending disestablisment

2018-06-04 23:41:54 UTC  

thats a big discussion now

2018-06-04 23:41:55 UTC  

Religious police too

2018-06-04 23:42:11 UTC  

no, more like a religious council to advise lawmakers

2018-06-04 23:42:14 UTC  

Show ankles, get whipped

2018-06-04 23:42:24 UTC  

lol

2018-06-04 23:42:46 UTC  

White sharia now

2018-06-04 23:42:49 UTC  

So, I see when I talk about constraints on the power of government that you mention constitutions, and that makes sense because it's a lot of how the nuts and bolts works in the west. But I think it's better to look at moral philosophy for your constraints. Lockeian type stuff.

Honestly this might be part of my confusion, because I don't see the lines in which government should be constrained as some sort of edict made by powerful people. I see it as a consequence of nature, or 'natural law,' as they say. That means there is no contradiction between 'having any laws at all' and 'there is no excuse for law X Y Z'

2018-06-04 23:43:04 UTC  

Because there is a delineation there that transcends.

2018-06-04 23:43:07 UTC  

'Rights' basically.

2018-06-04 23:43:11 UTC  

None fully on, @M4Gunner there are some facets of it in some systems, but the best example is probably Israel

2018-06-04 23:43:41 UTC  

Its probably the fullest expression of a traditional view codified into law and Natsoc in direction

2018-06-04 23:43:59 UTC  

Not the tradition of europeans, though close, since it was just a bunch of eastern europeans who made it

2018-06-04 23:44:10 UTC  

but the jew thing is obvioously a bit of a problem

2018-06-04 23:44:18 UTC  

not for them of course

2018-06-04 23:44:41 UTC  

Ah

2018-06-04 23:44:44 UTC  

There it is

2018-06-04 23:44:58 UTC  

Yes, Israel is NatSoc

2018-06-04 23:45:27 UTC  

So we could see that as an expression of Fascism, but accordingly, if it were in teh USA, it wouldnt be a "jewish homeland"

2018-06-04 23:45:37 UTC  

but theirs is.

2018-06-04 23:46:14 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/372507611284766722/453343755244929035/hawk1.png

2018-06-04 23:46:27 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/372507611284766722/453343810076803073/red-tailed-hawk-2921-ron-dudley.png

2018-06-04 23:46:41 UTC  

when I'm angry

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/372507611284766722/453343870206476288/broad_winged_head.png

2018-06-04 23:46:53 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/372507611284766722/453343920689250326/red_tailed_hawk_11.png

2018-06-04 23:47:18 UTC  

israel is nat soc

2018-06-04 23:47:21 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/372507611284766722/453344036959551499/Sparrowhawk_1a_6086084921.png

2018-06-04 23:47:21 UTC  

Yes, @Mercury I understand, but there is a value-less position that takes " any thing people want ", which is fine when defacto everyone is christian and white and speaks the same language and is homogenous...you dont HAVE to codify any of it, its already done.

2018-06-04 23:47:22 UTC  

There must be some meme here I'm not familiar with :p

2018-06-04 23:47:23 UTC  

oh well