Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 453342739967246346
silly
@Mercury
I've done that before, and i've seen him before
so meh
have fun while you can
Im not mad, Im just having to start repeating
its getting boring
Here
For your ass
Okay What is a meta political document?
It’s the big gay
@Deleted User Don't worry. You're just presenting something very alien to people. You gotta have patience.
Can fascists have a constitutional document? You guys are too much
lol
true
Theyre not putting into vision a political ideaology, it would have a set of laws and principles....like any state
Ours would have more social codes....
perhaps even ending disestablisment
thats a big discussion now
Religious police too
Show ankles, get whipped
lol
White sharia now
So, I see when I talk about constraints on the power of government that you mention constitutions, and that makes sense because it's a lot of how the nuts and bolts works in the west. But I think it's better to look at moral philosophy for your constraints. Lockeian type stuff.
Honestly this might be part of my confusion, because I don't see the lines in which government should be constrained as some sort of edict made by powerful people. I see it as a consequence of nature, or 'natural law,' as they say. That means there is no contradiction between 'having any laws at all' and 'there is no excuse for law X Y Z'
Because there is a delineation there that transcends.
'Rights' basically.
None fully on, @M4Gunner there are some facets of it in some systems, but the best example is probably Israel
Its probably the fullest expression of a traditional view codified into law and Natsoc in direction
Not the tradition of europeans, though close, since it was just a bunch of eastern europeans who made it
but the jew thing is obvioously a bit of a problem
not for them of course
Ah
There it is
Yes, Israel is NatSoc
So we could see that as an expression of Fascism, but accordingly, if it were in teh USA, it wouldnt be a "jewish homeland"
but theirs is.
