Well it ended with egg on her face

at least she got *some*thing on her face <:pepe_smug:378719408341909506>

"it's a pretty sound theory"

fuck's sake

Also said that ABC is telling the truth
And she is Australian

I kinda see her point

ABC is 'telling the truth' about what

Dicks are a social construct

The "privilege river"?

The rap

Ahe defended it

yeah

fucking hell

If I slap you in the face with my penis, Amita, but then claim it's only a conceptual penis, was it *really* sexual assault?

I have to read the paper for myself though. can anyone give me the TL;DR

Cetronius is a social construct

@Reaps Uh

yeah, I suppose

Wait a fucking second

Maybe in the sense that I'm so popular that people worship my essence and want to be like me, like a Jordan Peterson meta-hero

is the paper claiming the penis doesn't really exist or something

Cetronius is a conceptual social construct

@Deleted User I'm assuming it doesn't say that

Me too

@Deleted User https://www.skeptic.com/downloads/conceptual-penis/23311886.2017.1330439.pdf

here

#metoo

```Philosopher Peter Boghossian and his collaborator James Lindsay decided to see if they could pull off a hoax paper in the mode of Alan Sokal's "Transgressing the Boundaries: Towards a Transformative Hermeneutics of Quantum Gravity," which facetiously claimed that quantum gravity is a "social construct" yet still managed to get published in the cultural studies journal Social Text in 1996.```

I didn't read it but I'm assuming it says penises are kind of like a metaphircal power

Or something like that

Cetronius is just a figment of our collective imagination

No, I'm real

THE FUCK

Hi @Deleted User

How are you?

```"The androcentric scientific and meta-scientific evidence that the penis is the male reproductive organ is considered overwhelming and largely uncontroversial."

That’s how we began. We used this preposterous sentence to open a “paper” consisting of 3,000 words of utter nonsense posing as academic scholarship. Then a peer-reviewed academic journal in the social sciences accepted and published it.

This paper should never have been published. Titled, “The Conceptual Penis as a Social Construct,” our paper “argues” that “The penis vis-à-vis maleness is an incoherent construct. We argue that the conceptual penis is better understood not as an anatomical organ but as a gender-performative, highly fluid social construct.” As if to prove philosopher David Hume’s claim that there is a deep gap between what is and what ought to be, our should-never-have-been-published paper was published in the open-access (meaning that articles are freely accessible and not behind a paywall), peer-reviewed journal Cogent Social Sciences.```

@Deleted User that's exactly what an imagination would say

Hello, cetro. I'm working on a new piece

Good

Pieces are good