Message from @King Canuck
Discord ID: 457988855098769409
Link it again see who cares
Whoops
Reeee
Sorry
Wrong channel
that was my friend
Free Tommy my dudes
how's that wikipedia page @King Canuck
*fuck*
hey @meratrix it's back
"At VidCon 2017 Benjamin sat in the front row at a panel discussion featuring Anita Sarkeesian as part of a targeted harassment campaign against her.[12][13] Benjamin later claimed he was not present with the intention of harassing Sarkeesian stating he would like to know how she "would like to be approached". VidCon issued a statement apologising for the situation "which resulted in [Sarkeesian] being subjected to a hostile environment that she had not signed up for".[12]"
god damnit
well, I expected this
but still
it's a blatant lie.
Also his official picture on the page looks kinda bad
he looks like a creep in a basement
@King Canuck it's that grayfell faggot
It's probably like the swatting of Hogg, done by a group of shitheads with no political leanings (but on their interview with Tim Pool they said they were anti-gun.)
creepy shit
Good on IMC for redacting
that guy who swatted hoggler?
"they can't do anything to us, we're minors."
ye
I'm debating on @ing IMC over there
nice timing
was just about to drop this in here
Friendly reminder that *all* sides are capable of.. massaging.. information
Just ping him. He talks here when talked to, unlike the other e-celebs.
@stillgray thanks for issuing the redacting Ian.
You had your reasons to come to the conclusions you did but when the facts came oiut you issued a redaction
I know I already tweeted this at you, but that's more than the MSM would usually do
👍
@King Canuck doesn't (((twitter))) hide replies n shit?
Somtimes
I don't get tweeted at often at all but when I do I usually get notifs
@King Canuck I have readded the fixed section. For Greyfall, follow your own rule. "We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Carl Benjamin, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say.
Fixed that shit again