Monroe Doctrine was necissary

tbh I'd be on board with ditching NATO in favor of strengthening the Rio Pact

what's the rio pact?

and bringing the countries that left back on board

The Rio Pact is a defensive pact that has most of the nations of the Americas as members

Latin Union when?

Again*

@RMS_Gigantic they don't teach you about that shit

especially the ones that don't contain European colonies, or former European colonies that never fought for independence, such as Suriname and Canada

Im a fan of leaving the UN and probably Nato since it isnt doing what it was meant for anymore

It was made after WWII

An attack on one was to be considered an attack on them all

Suriname has a sad history

what Nato?

@Goblin_Slayer_Floki Wanking material: https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/193/text

```To end membership of the United States in the United Nations.```

In short it was meant to keep America in, Russia out, germany down, and UK up

<:thronk:441701565607444482> <:thronk:441701565607444482> <:thronk:441701565607444482>

When decolonization was all the rage, suriname was a poverty stricken shithole and the leftist dutch party at the time decided to kick them out

of course they did

<:thronk:441701565607444482>

they put the cyrrent law in place

I love that the US is re-embracing its anti-British, anti-Canadian roots

of course they arnt against it

@Reaps Ty for the offer but ehh nah.

Canada was only created specifically to deny the US that territory

@RMS_Gigantic Canadians are just traitorous Americans than need to be brought back.
Change my mind

just look at the timeframe of Canadian confederation compared to the Fenian Raids, the Annexation Bill of 1866, and the Alaskan Purchase

@Reaps With another tweet on the side

It's almost like they don't want a solution <:thronk:441701565607444482>

@Deleted User You're right, and we need to Republic of Texas the shit out of them

Come on, we have the numbers!

They dont

Worth reposting here:

https://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/the-big-immigration-charade/

"Trump's compromise on DACA, offering the opportunity for 1.8 million young (or youngish) people to stay in the country in exchange for a wall and a more regulated immigration system, was surprisingly generous. Many Republicans blanched. **But the Democrats were having none of it. That would have put an end to this issue, at least for the nonce, and they would have lost their football**.

So instead we have a fiesta of hypocrisy with one supposed genius who once ran the CIA comparing what's going on on our border to Auschwitz (how anti-Semitic is that!) and the Mexican government, which treats immigrants somewhere south of lepers and has vicious controls on its Guatemalan border, jumping in to condemn the U.S. treatment of these children."

The law is a Dem law signed by clinton. And they can hang trump with it

supposidly

Dems: Trump's executive orders are a problem
Also Dems: No legislation, Trump should use an executive order

You know they would get hom for *overreach* now he did

it was a setup