Message from @LOLTRON
Discord ID: 463334944953991178
Mostly for envirometal protection
Also it helps to drive prices up for real estate moguls
There's a lot of economic reasons why residential zones are limited. As zones get bigger, the cost of maintenance and support increases proportionally. Roads, parks, infrastructure, sewage, water etc...
<:think_woke:378717098681171988>
Most metropolitan areas are deep blue
very zoned
very regulated
and as such, the supply is slower to react
I have no knowledge of australian economy
```The bottom line is that running a high immigration program requires massive investment and costs a lot, and these costs are borne to a large extent by the incumbent population.
Therefore, if you want wages to be reduced, traffic congestion to get worse, to pay more for utilities and housing, and to see the environment get degraded, then continue with current mass immigration settings. But if you care about maintaining Australian living standards, then immigration needs to be slashed to sensible and sustainable levels.```
Looks convincing, although its unconventional economist ™
If they're fleeing a country that violates their human rights, then the country should be colonized by a civilized country.
The UK could do with a revenue bump... The Anglosphere could do with a boost in numbers...
Yeah of Anglos
@DanielKO colonization without dealing w the colonized people seems to end poorly
I thought dealing with the colonized people was the problem, generally?
Depends on your morals
It’s real easy to deal w them if you have no morals, or at least a different moral system than most Whites do today
True.
It is important to note that looking at wage growth for all workers is not certain too
Given that the recession slowed down wage growth for almost all non-super upper class people
Almost all developed economies, both high immigration and low immigration are having higher productivity and lower wage growth
Dad Rock weeew
A lot of that is heavily correllated to the transition from a manufacturing to an intellectual developing economy.. Which is happening in most Western countries...
I'm just following the logical steps from the left.
If it's inhumane to send the immigrants back to their shitholes, then somebody has to un-shithole the shithole.
Therefore, they're pro-colonization.
Unless they believe shitholes should remain shitholes, in which case they're racists.
It depends if sending them back is actually inhumane, doesn't it?
That's what leftists are saying, right? That deporting illegal immigrants is a violation of their human rights.
If they're economic migrants, then it wouldn't be illegal to deport them, I would think.
I'd be curious to know what they are basing that on.
Morally, is it right to pull people on to a lifeboat, if pulling more people on will increase the change of capsizing the lifeboat?
"Immigrating to the USA for a better life is a human right!"
Also...
"The USA is the most racist, bigoted, sexist, rapey, gun-violence-ridden country in the world!"
There is a clear dissonance there...
"lets go get oppressed"
I was oppressed once... I got better...
**Doctor Nog#1224** was cleansed from the server.
Which human right? Half the problem is 'they' don't seem to understand what a 'Human Right' actually is...
A smart phone is a human right!
As long as it isn't an iPhone
^
This.
As far as I can tell, “human rights” don’t exist except that which you can guarantee for yourself. Nature has no “human rights,” they are by definition a social construct