He's a loon, but he's also playing a bit for other loons

Also, Gunn was just harrased on social media, but still has his profile, tweets, and job

There's the difference that actually matters

alex even had his linkin profile deleted

brb

Alex was colluded against by multiple companies, removing him contrary to their TOS

Its not like there was one, singular thing crossposted to all the sites that simultaneously violated everyone's TOS

Gunn LOST his job

and a side note, insider roumers was that it was not the alt right that did presure Gunns firening. it was the #metoo movment that did scare the shit out of the ceo of disney now that the tweets was back in daylight

they did fire him before the #metoo was able to move in hope to save MCU face

Oh, Gunn got fired?

Yeah, he got fired by Disney over the tweets

Didn't you read the news?

It was all over the internet for weeks and weeks

Also, Gunn was a contracted employee of Disney, so he's also representing them. No one brings that up

That's why the hashtag is "RehireJamesGunn"

they are never gona rehire him as long as #metoo is around. they are to afraid of them attacking them and making a mess of the last cash cow disney have left

Also, in relation to Alex Jones and the whole "c'mon, prove he inspired people to do violence thing"...I don't even have to bring up Pizzagate. What about Finsbury Park?

That was on 4chan long before Alex Jones

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/jan/24/darren-osborne-uk-mosque-attack-suspect-read-infow/

And I remind you this...is the WASHINGTON TIMES. They're not known for being liberal. At all.

Also, social media platforms are not publishers, so they shouldn't act like ones.

:dollar:** Support Sargon of Akkad on Maker support and Patreon!** :dollar:

https://www.makersupport.com/sargonofakkad

https://www.patreon.com/sargon

Already a Maker Support / Patreon donator? Send a screenshot to JDM_WAAAT and you will get the Patreon role.

But they do have an obligation to make sure that people aren't ABUSING said platforms because rampant abuse makes it harder on everyone

well as facebook did start editing like a publisher they are resposible for ALL content on facebook

Facebook are cowards.

I've always thought so.

They only care about money and advertising and selling your private info to advertisers

@SaintHeartwing No, see, PUBLISHERS are obligated to curate their clients content.

Because they are liable

why do you all use social media? i've been unplugged for like, 4 years. Never been happier.

Thats why i came in here last week asking questions

Why? Simple. Baltimore.

While the MSM was preoccupied with 'Nerd Prom', REAL news was unfolding on Twitter, with people actually talking, filming and showing what was happening.

This is why social media exists. To help bring to light stuff ignored by "normal" media outlets

with the baning of alex jones they did open pandoras box on all the sights. if someone makes a vid promoting terrorisem, with the new rules youtube have a part of the blame if something happens. it was not like that before the banning

Or rather, it's a useful tool to FORCE them to pay attention

Isn't still super easy to fall into an echochamber though?

@SaintHeartwing Once you start acting like you are liable for your users content, the laws governing publishers should be brought into play, which removes a lot of the protections they currently enjoy

You ARE somewhat liable for the content because you make the rules that determine what is and isn't allowed

https://twitter.com/DanielJHannan/status/1026428431913889792