no they dont

<:pepe_why:378719408367075333> facepalming really hard

They teach u how to peel potatoes

but thank god im educated way beyond just having been in the marines

for mess hall

nice, more insults

@Capitán Alatriste Deeper than that, in legal terms, removing their slave part, it was a valid opion still

your persuassion skills are quite lacking

you argue worse than any marine i ever met

the slave part was a pretty big reason, since it was their main socio economic drive

Slave part was trivial cmon

Not really a big deal, am i right fellas?

their way of life, was about to be destroyed utterly

Cuckistador is right about that it was a big part of the economy

@Capitán Alatriste Right, but up until that point the states were literally like the differing countries in the EU

ironically it was a failing economy at that

they just wanted to continue living like fuedal lords

kek

imo

You're not wrong @YoyoNoritake

@Broo TulsiGang 2024 🇬🇧 🇺🇸

@Kraut get in here, we need scientists

Imagine if the EU took up arms against the UK because of Brexit. Would they be considered traitors?

Yeah cause they're euro swine

i think in your proposition, the eu might regard england as traitors

not england would consider eu a tyrant if the eu took up arms against them

But England was under the impression that they could just walk away

lol, no one ever walks awayu

@Fitzydog not so much, the US states were more closely bound to each other than today's EU. They had a Federal army and the President had direct control over each state if need be not to mention supreme power.
The European Union is more loosely built with each country enjoying autonomy within EU law. There is no "European Army" and defence is each country's responsibility. The president of the EU commission does not have direct control over individual countries.

UwU

havent you seen movies

prior to that point im not so sure, the two major power grabs by the us fed govn, were the civil war and ww2

@Capitán Alatriste The direct control, and supremacy clause we're still hotly debated during the Civil War

Once the civil war ignited President Abraham Lincoln became Commander in Chief of the armies and he held the responsibility of the entire nation (Union)

@Deleted User hahaha, that's great 😂

@Capitán Alatriste, yes and one could argue that prior to the civil war those powers were not granted to the Federal government

Hell, prior to the Civil war, some states argued successfully that they had the authority to negotiate tariffs on their own behalf

**Way133#1121** was cleansed from the server.

https://twitter.com/FarLeftWatch/status/1030544424617562112

Well....