Message from @SomeUser27

Discord ID: 567488434713919509


2019-04-15 23:13:57 UTC  

"Guys Trump will cause WWIII with north korea!!111"

2019-04-15 23:14:00 UTC  

3 years later

2019-04-15 23:14:01 UTC  

I feel if Michelle ran, like trump would have a bit more resistance against him since she could help unite the left in the determination to resist trump

2019-04-15 23:14:09 UTC  

3 years later they're best buds

2019-04-15 23:14:18 UTC  

and best korea is thriving super power

2019-04-15 23:14:22 UTC  

Honestly I think trumps handled North Korea pretty well

2019-04-15 23:14:26 UTC  

I need to listen to the Gulag Archipelago now.

2019-04-15 23:14:27 UTC  

And since she would be the best of both worlds for the left, black+ woman

2019-04-15 23:14:28 UTC  

well time is ticking and she has made no indication she will run

2019-04-15 23:14:30 UTC  

At least compared to past presidents

2019-04-15 23:14:33 UTC  

Honestly michelle is prolly their best bet

2019-04-15 23:14:36 UTC  

Bye.

2019-04-15 23:14:50 UTC  

But she hasnt made a move

2019-04-15 23:14:54 UTC  

Honestly she probably is since the corporate democrats are falling apart

2019-04-15 23:15:17 UTC  

Has she said anything about 2020 or 2024?

2019-04-15 23:15:19 UTC  

If the democrats want a chance they need reform

2019-04-15 23:15:27 UTC  

But we all know that won’t happen

2019-04-15 23:15:30 UTC  

now Uncle *snnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnniiiiiiiiiiiiiiiifffffffffffffffff* Joe is probably out i guess she is

2019-04-15 23:15:44 UTC  

Nah they need to be wack a moled into the floor until they learn to rebuild

2019-04-15 23:15:55 UTC  

Here is the problem with 2 monolith parties

2019-04-15 23:16:26 UTC  

Guys we don’t need parties in politics -George Washington probably

2019-04-15 23:16:33 UTC  

You need at least a third for contention

2019-04-15 23:16:42 UTC  

**janderson60#1838** was cleansed from the server.

2019-04-15 23:16:42 UTC  

I mean two party systems are awful

2019-04-15 23:16:58 UTC  

Where most people would want a form og Purple their choices are red, blue of orange.

2019-04-15 23:17:08 UTC  

SomeUser is right apparantly 2016 wasn't a big enough defeat to force self reflection they need to be crushed twice at least before they will look in a mirror

2019-04-15 23:17:17 UTC  

There’s a lot less for each party to lose when there’s only two

2019-04-15 23:17:31 UTC  

Like either you’re in charge or you’re the official opposition

2019-04-15 23:17:51 UTC  

But if it was 3+ party’s then the stakes are way higher

2019-04-15 23:18:22 UTC  

Maybe it would actually make the ‘big two’ kick their game up a notch

2019-04-15 23:18:23 UTC  

problem with loads of parties though is you get these coallitions in power that can't do anything

2019-04-15 23:18:32 UTC  

Just like UKIP forcing a referendum

2019-04-15 23:18:40 UTC  

lots of european countries have coalition governments... UK seems to be going that way

2019-04-15 23:18:47 UTC  

Rappers loved Donald Trump

2019-04-15 23:18:49 UTC  

I like how it is in the Netherlands with many many small parties none of which hold majority, i suspect that ends up with the constituents views being better represented

2019-04-15 23:18:50 UTC  

until he ran for office

2019-04-15 23:18:54 UTC  

That’s why there needs to be the right balance I guess though

2019-04-15 23:19:00 UTC  

Honestly I would’ve been a democrat (not progressive or far left) since I believe in social programs (but not to live off of, but to assist and help) since I believe that we need to invest into the future, but it shouldn’t come at the cost of impoverishing the whole society since sustainability is something really important which a. Lot of socialist nations ignore and then burn to the floor

2019-04-15 23:19:11 UTC  

**x.snowy.x#7147** was cleansed from the server.

2019-04-15 23:19:11 UTC  

the SNP has been a big problem in the UK

2019-04-15 23:19:18 UTC  

Like 2 big party’s and 1-3 ‘upcoming ones’