facebook sounds like a great company <:HonkHonk:566814473646768128>

👌

doesn't sound too bad tho

i wondered @Tero cuz a good amount of ppl are aware of the crisis, u don't think some ppl would intentionally spark the civil war? It wouldn't take too much, especially when the divide's getting bigger everyday

not really
much as soy boys and cuckservatives might despise each other, neither really seem like they want to kill the other enough just yet

<:kek:590371888480387073>

hm, rip

the far left atleast looks bloodthirsty

they're a pretty tiny minority tho, imo

ye i didnt know how big they are actually

i guess they're gaining numbers way too slowly still

most people in the US are either normie boomer cuckservatives or disaffected libtards

rip

neither group is really interest in armed conflict unless they don't get their daily bread and circuses

which, to their credit, tptb are good at providing

pretty difficult to convince anyone who feels physically safe and materially secure to give that up and go to war with their countrymen 😅

true, what probably will spark true unrest is a outside event. like a democrat run city ends up being a fucked over by a pandemic

ye

it insane how fast a city will collapse if the support structure gets disrupted

No YouTube

I think you could argue that the economic nightmare Germany faced after WW1 does make their resentment and desire for revenge understandable. I can see why many Germans would see war as the only way to improve things. It's shortsighted and foolish but, I can at least understand it. I don't think that would justify hostilities, not even close, but it does give context.

A lot of people didn't know the full scope of Hitler's ambition

They thought he would just get back the Polish parts and Northern Schleswig and leave it at that

Right. But then again the headline is why HITLER had to start WWII. Not the Germans as a whole. So I think I disagree on that basis with the video, though I haven't watched it. Hitler had no redeeming or justifying, humanizing goals in starting war.

If it hadn't been Hitler it would've been someone else

It may have been someone way less insane.

Who genuinely just felt that being blamed for WWI was fucked and wanted to force the Allies to right that wrong.

That would be awful in terms of the cost of human life and suffering but at least the reasoning would have been... Acceptable.

Not evil.

I believe that resource wars are a very human thing. To act like they're an evil thing is to ignore humanity. A war of ideology and racial supremacy? That is evil.

They can be natural and human and still be evil

Yes. But we can at least understand them.

If the Jews had been killed for economic reasons, like the Indians at Wounded Knee, I doubt they would feel much better about it

You know?

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/518798189982384169/565936642326790148/snekk.gif

That isn't what I meant. I don't think there is ever a circumstance in which ethnic genocide is an economic solution to a problem. Conquering territory is usually what comes to mind.

https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/518798189982384169/585714935208738835/melon.gif

Anti-semitic rhetoric was common in pre-Nazi Germany, even before Hitler joined the nazi party.

If these people have a kind of intuitive solidarity with each other and can thus put up a consistent effort to prevent you from extracting resources from the territory then genocide is usually the solution that comes to mind for the conquerors