Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 420268454394724353
I wonder if there will be space deniers in space colonies of the future.
And, even further into the future, earth deniers.
Earthcucks
oh jesus 😦
I doubt there will be spac colonies
Science Fiction with regard to space exploration has clouded out logic in regards to how we perceive it.
A manned lunar base is not that far off
Based on what?
The technologies we have available
Like?
We are able to land on the the moon, therefore we have the technology for a base already.
A rudimentary one, but with local mineral extraction and manufacturing it's easily possible to build a permanent one
What about the deleterious effects of lower gravity on human physiology?
Or diminishing returns in terms of supply loads?
Ryge problem is the necessary redundancy in the engineering as well
You have one bolt fail and a colony dies
I think you are putting the cart before the horse.
No testing on lunar gravity has been done so far, might be just as bad as 0G, might solve all health issues.
What do you want to return and why?
The ISS is doing well so far, use the same concept and manufacture spares on site
You can only carry so much in terms of supplies to the Colony
What essential supplies cannot be recycled or periodically resupplied?
@[soat] the ISS staff have serious health problems on return to esrth
Yes, which is why we need data on lunar levels of gravity
What if a supply rocket to the iss blows? (as happened before)
The distance is much greater.
But you can harvest most minerals on site, maybe even oxygen
And you can prepare a backup
How do you have the energy to produce them?
Solar
Think of the size of an array you would need
It's much more efficient than on earth, as there is no atmosphere or clouds
It's not that but manufacturing requires lots of electricity
If the necessary components are available you just need a starting base and can expand from there, you don't even necessarily need a crew with more advanced autonomous ground vehicles and remote operators
But would the commercial viability be?
I disagree that it would work but we have to just come to that conclusion
So what would the purpose of investment be?
Staking a claim before anyone else does,
building better telescopes,
building the first base on a different celestial body,
Possibly supplying shipyards in lunar orbit (lower escape velocity than earth, therefore cheaper)
I have an interesting "future conspiracy theory" I'm going to share that I've been thinking about for many years now.
Obviously the united states landed on the moon. The evidence is overwhelming and irrefutable. However, there is one problem. A question moon landing deniers ask that will only get louder as time goes on "Why did we stop going back?"
This question is going to keep being asked past the point that everyone involved with the Apollo missions is going to have died. Eventually, the moon landing deniers are going to win. They'll push their theory across generations, and as long as we never go back they will eventually win the argument. A single trickle of insanity wearing down a boulder of factual evidence.
But it gets worse.
At some point someone else is going to land on the moon. Most likely the Chinese. In the course of their missions there they may decide to pay a visit to one or more Apollo landing sites. And what do you know? They find nothing.