Message from @John of Arc

Discord ID: 634100188067266588


2019-09-20 18:41:05 UTC  
2019-09-22 19:10:11 UTC  

Perhaps some of you can comment further to clarify? ACTION NEEDED: Stop Barr’s Gun Control Proposal | Gun Owners of America

https://gunowners.org/alert09192019/

2019-09-28 21:30:21 UTC  

Here's a unicorn, sea horse, wireless, handheld peacekeeper

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/449374397677961217/627618119053213742/IMG_4332.png

2019-09-28 21:31:20 UTC  

very non-scary for those who are usually afraid of assault weapons. LOL

2019-09-29 01:17:12 UTC  

its also not an ar-15, because it's not an ar-15.

2019-09-30 16:20:03 UTC  
2019-09-30 16:20:27 UTC  

It's reported they are months in back order now.

2019-10-03 06:56:53 UTC  
2019-10-03 10:29:09 UTC  

I'd rather live in Fallujah than San Francisco anyway.

2019-10-13 16:09:38 UTC  

What a clown show... Sad for their loss but, don't do the crime if you can't do the time. Of course the time in this case is being shot by someone protecting their life and their livelihood.

2019-10-15 04:48:10 UTC  

Anyone who knows anything about bump stocks knows they are fckin stupid. they change the whole way you fire and hold the gun and are incredibly awkward.

2019-10-15 04:48:27 UTC  

Also last week the ATF admitted they have no legal right to confiscate them

2019-10-16 18:47:45 UTC  

Bleezer, anyone who knows anything about gun control knows they will chip away until there are no rights left- Question is did Trump donate this pawn to win the war? Knowing that eventually it will be determined to be brought back and overruled.

2019-10-21 02:24:22 UTC  

Ya hes trolling them with it because he knows no one uses them and since theae idiots dont know any better anyway its a win

2019-10-21 07:28:31 UTC  

This is how we used to roll

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/449374397677961217/635741188426825728/1950sSearsCatalog.jpg

2019-10-21 14:33:12 UTC  

i think the agenda kicked in for removal of guns from public view after jfk's murder...the ds never lets a good crisis go to waste

2019-11-04 20:05:50 UTC  

Need help in debats: when some anti-2nd people argue that "most weapons you purchase, esp. automatic ones, are USELESS against professional armies the gov throw at you anyways, so its okay to ban them" What reasonings should we throw back at them ?

2019-11-04 21:19:44 UTC  

@Thoutzan My response is look what happened to every country where there guns were removed from the hands of citizens and socialism/progressive-ism turned into facism/communisim. Pol-Pot, Mao zeDung, Hitler, Stalin, all committed mass murder of their detractors. Do you realize the reason we are free is because we are armed? Also, the Iraq war, Afghanistan war both continue even though the dissidents are faced by superior fire power because they improvise, adapt and attempt to over come. Maybe it will be a losing battle against the US Military or maybe the US Military will not be shooting at the citizens as expected and will turn on those who are shredding the constitution the US Military have sworn to uphold and protect. Just a couple thoughts.

2019-11-04 21:22:47 UTC  

People can vote for socialism which will turn into communism but, we will have to shoot our way out of it. That's why they want our guns AND why they put this "we are hopeless against the US Military strength" meme. Blessings friend

2019-11-04 21:46:35 UTC  

@zeBond thanks ! You are absolutely right. In fact the meme is so ridiculous it's a fallacy by its own - 2nd amd says we can bear arms, then we can; no matter big or small, useful or useless, its our right to bear them and unconstitutional to ban them, simple and easy. People (surprisingly from both the left AND the right) are so brainwashed they bring up this meme over and over.

2019-11-04 21:48:59 UTC  

if they want to see profits of socialism and extreme gun laws ...tell the to look at calif or chicago...violent crime on the rise and extremely stupid laws on the books

2019-11-05 02:34:36 UTC  

@Thoutzan The "guns are useless against the military" argument is simply ignorant. Look at the fight the oeople in Iraq and Afghanistan put up with simple AKs (and IEDs). Its basically a doubke think, "The "assault rifle" is too deadly that you shouldn't own it" while at the same time, "Its not deadly enough to fight an army." As if soldiers are some sort of super human immune to civilian bullets. Maybe you alone couldn't fight off a military, but when all of us join together we become a militia quite capable of resisting an advance.

2019-11-08 03:01:51 UTC  
2019-11-11 23:05:27 UTC  

I meant to keep on the discussion but i was distracted by something else : @zeBond @one12alpha (TLI) @SirW00f cont'd our discussion - what do you think of banning accessories like bump stocks ? and what do you think of any gun laws in general ? Thanks !

2019-11-11 23:18:30 UTC  

@Thoutzan It seems to me gun laws, bump stocks, time delays from buying a gun being able to buy ammo for said gun, etc. are not used as a common sense restrictions but rather they serve as a sneak attack on the 2nd amendment. I would posit if the average citizen was armed there would be a lower crime rate as no reasonable person commits a crime when he thinks it could cost them their life, immediately; hence my argument for teachers who choose to be armed should allowed to be armed after proficiency is proved to the satisfaction of law enforcement. The bullies who attack schools will not be attacking any armed and dangerous teachers. As it stands in a majority of school districts, gun free zones are safe spaces for gun wielding bullies who didn't have the ability to work out differences with detractors IMO. What do you think?

2019-11-11 23:20:40 UTC  

And if the bullies don't know who is armed they will be double blinded and even more intimidated. JMO

2019-11-11 23:26:26 UTC  

I think I agree with you. that's why I see ban of bump stock as a sign of compromise or betrayal, while many anons will call me shill or argue that "bump stock / whatever assessors is useless hence it is okay to ban them"