I will think for myself and shoot for myself, as Q suggests

We life in the matrix.. it's game over

NOT

You have the RIGHT to defend yourself and your family

not to go out on a revenge

I am always wondering, if they can JFK'ed JFK, why we can't JFK that MF Soros ?

That old fart is on his way out anyway

Not soon enough, not when he is pimping 1000s of foreign invaders into US

We have to worry about his replacement

This is War, Q said himself, then what's wrong with sniping a VIP target in a war then ?

Just snipe them all, until no one dares to replace him - like what DS is doing to the whistleblowers

@LowLandsPete Will find the Q post but delete what I said about it till I do.

Won't bother. I will just assume I got it wrong. Please if I need to delete more tell me and I will.

@LowLandsPete I was in the Air Force for eight years. We do join and we do defend.

@Thoutzan Q has shown us to use the rule of law to combat the DS, not violence. They could have shortcutted things along time ago, but are proceeding in such a manner that they continue to have moral & legal authority. You have the right to the 2nd amendment, not to choose sniper targets or promote violence.

List keeps growing for the Democrats lol

They are so desperate

@lmbd I would suggest that Q's "trust the plan" is essentially protecting the kinds like Soros from a patriotic bullet. DS has used violence to silence many and yield good result for them. In a war, I see no injustice of returning that "favor" to these national enemies.

Remember in the 1960s a japanese young man katana'ed the popular socialist candidate and saved Japan from the socialism.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/oct/13/inejiro-asanuma-japan-politician-assassinated-1960

@Thoutzan Do you feel that Q is simply a means to distract and neutralize patriots and, is acting on behalf of the DS?

@lmbd I do. It is one of my many contradicting feelings.

To elaborate tho, I don't really believe DS is monilithic, nor do I believe anything 100% good or 100% bad. It could be that Q & Trump are 99% good but 1% compromised

I believe in pragmatism tho, as long as Trump Q are not the greater evil, as long as their message is good. I will support them.

That is your opinion. However, promoting violence as a means to resolve things is not what this server or Q is about, so please stop promoting that as an option here.

@Thoutzan First of all Deep State hides their murders rather well. So if Q is doing this it would also be hidden. If Q is. Do not suggest Q is having that done.

But secondly the plan is working. Do you not see how bad the Democrats are reacting. They have been driven insane.

I simply see no indication at all that the plan is not fully working. Q admits disinfo is necessary. Why Q made out bad actors were good when necessary.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/05/president-trumps-attorney-general-bill-barr-excels-crushes-dirty-cop-mueller-and-the-deep-state/

@Steve Angell if disinfo is necessary, then dis-peaceful too maybe ?
Of course, if refraining from violence is out of pragmatic reason for the long term strategic goal, I am all for it. I am just thinking for myself that if it is only out of ones' ego of a moral code and thus gives our enemy an advantage, it would be dumb AF.
Again, it is a war, winning is the only thing that matters right ?
@lmbd I will not touch the topic again. Thanks !

@Steve Angell why do you keep saying assassination and other violent things?

I see no evidence at all of that. All I see is violence from the left. Period. Leftis who pretend to be right and are violent.

Civil discussion is good, questions are good, but suggesting violence as a solution is not. @Steve Angell who has ever suggested anything other than using the rule of law???

@Malikstotle Is that word off limits. Even when you say this would not be a good thing to do?

You know exactly what you are doing don't play dumb

No I do not. I have no clue where you are coming from. I was saying that violence is not a good thing to do. Over and over.

"Is this not a whole lot better than assassinating Muller?"

This is unacceptable rhetoric ^^^

@MamaLana Sourdough can you let us know what kinds of posts etc will violate the terms of service please?

Did I not suggest against violence?

You contradict yourself

Be civil or you will be banned

Deleted. I will just remember these words are off limits.

Thank you