Message from @RandomDiscordAccount

Discord ID: 657165839619063838


2019-12-19 10:14:51 UTC  

?

2019-12-19 10:15:44 UTC  

tik is a dumbass who said hitler was a socialist

2019-12-19 10:16:22 UTC  

yeah because he goes outside the internationalist marxist definition of socialism and uses the neoliberal one

2019-12-19 10:17:02 UTC  

marxism makes up the majority of socialist ideals but they by far are not the only ones

2019-12-19 10:17:43 UTC  

that's nonsense. If all the socialists said that by their definition he wasn't a socialist that is more important than neolibs who dont understand socialism

2019-12-19 10:18:11 UTC  

not all self-proclaimed socialist said so

2019-12-19 10:18:43 UTC  

all socialist parties opposed him

2019-12-19 10:18:55 UTC  

except his own

2019-12-19 10:19:16 UTC  

and the Strasserist

2019-12-19 10:19:30 UTC  

strasserists were purged

2019-12-19 10:19:38 UTC  

yeah, after the fact

2019-12-19 10:19:50 UTC  

but were talking about initial support here

2019-12-19 10:20:23 UTC  

even the strasserists were really just anti-semetic socdems and not entirely socialist in ideology

2019-12-19 10:20:44 UTC  

if we want to talk long plan, then in Mein Kamp he states that he wanted a german nation with complete control over their economy and production that was not dependant on any outside nation

2019-12-19 10:21:25 UTC  

that's just self sufficiency / autarky not socialism

2019-12-19 10:21:32 UTC  

He was a state capitalist

2019-12-19 10:21:39 UTC  

"complete control over their economy and production"

2019-12-19 10:21:54 UTC  

@Phalanx in the beginging he was an industrialist for sure

2019-12-19 10:21:58 UTC  

by that he meant ethnic german bourgeois controlled it

2019-12-19 10:22:12 UTC  

hitler was a class collaborationist

2019-12-19 10:22:25 UTC  

im pretty sure he meant by the nation state

2019-12-19 10:22:47 UTC  

like german capitalism in the 1930s were them trying to gain production

2019-12-19 10:22:52 UTC  

@RandomDiscordAccount I'd say at no point was he ever an actual Socialist since Socialism is inherently Marxist

2019-12-19 10:23:19 UTC  

hitler allowed the bourgeoisie to continue under him

2019-12-19 10:23:22 UTC  

To use a Neolibs definition of "Socialism" basically encapsulates 100's of ideologies that are nowhere close to Socialism

2019-12-19 10:23:29 UTC  

he just worked with them

2019-12-19 10:23:34 UTC  

it would be like calling Stalin a capitalist for selling grains internationally rather than feeding his starving rural population

2019-12-19 10:23:37 UTC  

and asked them to make things for him

2019-12-19 10:24:06 UTC  

@Phalanx the term socialism predates marx though which is why im iffy on giving marxist a monopoly on the term

2019-12-19 10:24:14 UTC  

Capitalism is about economy, which under Hitler was based on Capital

2019-12-19 10:24:38 UTC  

private businesses were the main driving force in the third reich's economy

2019-12-19 10:24:48 UTC  

@Fidel Castro no one disagrees

2019-12-19 10:25:02 UTC  

I don't think private businesses are compatible with Socialism

2019-12-19 10:25:07 UTC  

im explaining long term planning rather than short term industrialization

2019-12-19 10:25:41 UTC  

Well saying you're a Socialist and implementing a Socialist government are two different things

2019-12-19 10:25:46 UTC  

even long term planning he would have kept around private industry

2019-12-19 10:26:02 UTC  

in fact he may have allowed it to become more privately owned once the war was over

2019-12-19 10:26:35 UTC  

we can hardly conclude that 15 years of office encapsulated the extent of the man's mind when he was preoccupied with the german race's future in the next centuries when they would go to an inevitable war with the yellow races

2019-12-19 10:26:52 UTC  

based on what i remember reading, i think otherwise

2019-12-19 10:27:11 UTC  

and during the last 5 years, we did see an uptick in nationalizing of industries

2019-12-19 10:27:17 UTC  

its whatever though