Message from @RandomDiscordAccount

Discord ID: 657165646655651840


2019-12-17 23:19:28 UTC  
2019-12-19 10:14:37 UTC  

>tik

2019-12-19 10:14:41 UTC  

lmao

2019-12-19 10:14:51 UTC  

?

2019-12-19 10:15:44 UTC  

tik is a dumbass who said hitler was a socialist

2019-12-19 10:16:22 UTC  

yeah because he goes outside the internationalist marxist definition of socialism and uses the neoliberal one

2019-12-19 10:17:02 UTC  

marxism makes up the majority of socialist ideals but they by far are not the only ones

2019-12-19 10:17:43 UTC  

that's nonsense. If all the socialists said that by their definition he wasn't a socialist that is more important than neolibs who dont understand socialism

2019-12-19 10:18:11 UTC  

not all self-proclaimed socialist said so

2019-12-19 10:18:43 UTC  

all socialist parties opposed him

2019-12-19 10:18:55 UTC  

except his own

2019-12-19 10:19:16 UTC  

and the Strasserist

2019-12-19 10:19:30 UTC  

strasserists were purged

2019-12-19 10:19:38 UTC  

yeah, after the fact

2019-12-19 10:19:50 UTC  

but were talking about initial support here

2019-12-19 10:20:23 UTC  

even the strasserists were really just anti-semetic socdems and not entirely socialist in ideology

2019-12-19 10:20:44 UTC  

if we want to talk long plan, then in Mein Kamp he states that he wanted a german nation with complete control over their economy and production that was not dependant on any outside nation

2019-12-19 10:21:25 UTC  

that's just self sufficiency / autarky not socialism

2019-12-19 10:21:32 UTC  

He was a state capitalist

2019-12-19 10:21:39 UTC  

"complete control over their economy and production"

2019-12-19 10:21:54 UTC  

@Phalanx in the beginging he was an industrialist for sure

2019-12-19 10:21:58 UTC  

by that he meant ethnic german bourgeois controlled it

2019-12-19 10:22:12 UTC  

hitler was a class collaborationist

2019-12-19 10:22:25 UTC  

im pretty sure he meant by the nation state

2019-12-19 10:22:47 UTC  

like german capitalism in the 1930s were them trying to gain production

2019-12-19 10:22:52 UTC  

@RandomDiscordAccount I'd say at no point was he ever an actual Socialist since Socialism is inherently Marxist

2019-12-19 10:23:19 UTC  

hitler allowed the bourgeoisie to continue under him

2019-12-19 10:23:22 UTC  

To use a Neolibs definition of "Socialism" basically encapsulates 100's of ideologies that are nowhere close to Socialism

2019-12-19 10:23:29 UTC  

he just worked with them

2019-12-19 10:23:34 UTC  

it would be like calling Stalin a capitalist for selling grains internationally rather than feeding his starving rural population

2019-12-19 10:23:37 UTC  

and asked them to make things for him

2019-12-19 10:24:06 UTC  

@Phalanx the term socialism predates marx though which is why im iffy on giving marxist a monopoly on the term

2019-12-19 10:24:14 UTC  

Capitalism is about economy, which under Hitler was based on Capital

2019-12-19 10:24:38 UTC  

private businesses were the main driving force in the third reich's economy

2019-12-19 10:24:48 UTC  

@Fidel Castro no one disagrees

2019-12-19 10:25:02 UTC  

I don't think private businesses are compatible with Socialism

2019-12-19 10:25:07 UTC  

im explaining long term planning rather than short term industrialization

2019-12-19 10:25:41 UTC  

Well saying you're a Socialist and implementing a Socialist government are two different things

2019-12-19 10:25:46 UTC  

even long term planning he would have kept around private industry

2019-12-19 10:26:02 UTC  

in fact he may have allowed it to become more privately owned once the war was over