Message from @RandomDiscordAccount

Discord ID: 722922503613448252


2020-06-13 16:03:19 UTC  

The study is fairly meta on the subject and is more than enough to advocate for the claim that prenatal development leads to secondary sexual character observed in the brain that is atypical of their sex in regards to their primary sexual characteristics. A personal theory of mine is that the number of homosexuals and transgenders in society has increased as a result of more births occurring at an older age and/or at less healthy BMIs which both affect prenatal hormonal development.

2020-06-13 16:19:20 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/526921073397071892/721398312766537768/1592000990163.png

2020-06-14 19:40:27 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/526921073397071892/721811311847276638/unknown.png

2020-06-16 00:41:09 UTC  

to be continued...

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/526921073397071892/722249371550220309/Screen_Shot_2020-06-15_at_8.28.26_PM.png

2020-06-16 13:12:35 UTC  
2020-06-16 19:14:32 UTC  

ill take your word on it

2020-06-16 19:14:35 UTC  

the looks match

2020-06-17 22:30:06 UTC  

What's the problem with bestiality?

2020-06-17 22:30:19 UTC  

It brings enjoyment both for the person and for the animal

2020-06-17 22:30:29 UTC  

yet, it is prohibited in many countries

2020-06-17 23:06:51 UTC  

the same reason we ban necrophilia, because we consider those who do it to be disgusting and inferior and wish to punish them for it

2020-06-17 23:11:08 UTC  

this is kind of irrational, don't you agree?

2020-06-17 23:11:31 UTC  

by definition, it rational

2020-06-17 23:11:52 UTC  

I would say that it is rationalized, but not rational

2020-06-17 23:12:28 UTC  

rationality is just doing whats best for your interest, it just so happens that its in our interest to punish bestiality and necrophilia

2020-06-17 23:14:08 UTC  

I would say that something rational is something that isn't based in how your fell, but what you that's right

2020-06-17 23:14:56 UTC  

And I think that most people wouldn't agree in prohibiting something that harms no one, just because you don't like it

2020-06-17 23:15:26 UTC  

not in a rational way

2020-06-17 23:16:07 UTC  

what you 'know' that's right is nothing more than a moral imperative and is ultimately informed by nothing more than those 'feelings'

2020-06-17 23:16:44 UTC  

well... I guess I agree with this

2020-06-17 23:16:45 UTC  

there is no base morality to appeal to outside of those preferences unless you believe in the supernatural

2020-06-17 23:17:19 UTC  

as you can see by my agnostic role, I don't belive in it

2020-06-17 23:17:29 UTC  

so what you set as your moral imperative, or even what you define as 'harm' is irrelevant to whether its rational to pursue it

2020-06-17 23:18:12 UTC  

as long as you pursue your moral imperative / interest, you are behaving rationally

2020-06-17 23:19:39 UTC  

But... I think that most of us would tell to ourselves "I wouldn't want to punish someone that does something that harm no one just because I don't like it" and, at the same that, say "SEND THOSE NECROPHILES TO THE JAIL!"

2020-06-17 23:19:42 UTC  

That's irrational