Message from @RandomDiscordAccount
Discord ID: 722921437043753071
damn that’s the second time today i’m be seen that link
new study so its likely to be tossed around
The most interesting sections of the study seem to be going through the contention of how hormonal development during puberty interacts with the pre-existing hormonal development during prenatal development. It seems to suggest that puberty exacerbates any pre-existing gender delineation in terms of the norm but may not in terms of those who don't have proper hormonal natal development.
The study is fairly meta on the subject and is more than enough to advocate for the claim that prenatal development leads to secondary sexual character observed in the brain that is atypical of their sex in regards to their primary sexual characteristics. A personal theory of mine is that the number of homosexuals and transgenders in society has increased as a result of more births occurring at an older age and/or at less healthy BMIs which both affect prenatal hormonal development.
to be continued...
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bIdeNc9ZngA
@RandomDiscordAccount This guy was a serial child abuser
ill take your word on it
the looks match
What's the problem with bestiality?
It brings enjoyment both for the person and for the animal
yet, it is prohibited in many countries
the same reason we ban necrophilia, because we consider those who do it to be disgusting and inferior and wish to punish them for it
this is kind of irrational, don't you agree?
by definition, it rational
I would say that it is rationalized, but not rational
rationality is just doing whats best for your interest, it just so happens that its in our interest to punish bestiality and necrophilia
I would say that something rational is something that isn't based in how your fell, but what you that's right
And I think that most people wouldn't agree in prohibiting something that harms no one, just because you don't like it
not in a rational way
what you 'know' that's right is nothing more than a moral imperative and is ultimately informed by nothing more than those 'feelings'
well... I guess I agree with this
there is no base morality to appeal to outside of those preferences unless you believe in the supernatural
as you can see by my agnostic role, I don't belive in it
so what you set as your moral imperative, or even what you define as 'harm' is irrelevant to whether its rational to pursue it