Message from @Friedrich
Discord ID: 798227993679364166
@Beth everything is in video and social media is streaming live the news .
Why would all the voters in a state be fine with fraud
No they don’t. However in this case the voters were not fine with it.
Also rule changes were made in Texas and nc, the Trump team for some reason didn’t go after them @AdvanceManExtraordinaire
thanks, just curious 🙂
I don’t think that’s a thing 😂 are the all the same party or something
@AdvanceManExtraordinaire he lost by the same machines he won in 2016.
I don’t think they should be faulted for that. Why should they sue in states they won when their goal is to pursue the legitimate outcome of the election?
Just saying everything I don’t like is fraud without evidence isn’t a thing that will garner credibility
Yep, the fact that he won in 2016 does seem to invalidate a lot of the conspiracy theories (other than the massive mail in voting and alleged lack of accurate signature verification)
The allegation is that the voting machines can be programmed to do whatever you want, or give access to third parties to do whatever they want. Not that their programmed to make people named trump lose.
What happened to every illegal vote and every legal vote counted. @AdvanceManExtraordinaire again penn was not a fraud case. That was a constitutional technicality case.
I’d like to hear the logic behind the theory that Hillary Clinton is so clean she would have never cheated
@Friedrich, you just advanced to level 3!
Hillary is a piece of work. Worst of the worst when it comes to dirty politics
I realize that that was the case, and the illegal votes should’ve been thrown out. On top of that it’s obvious that fraud occurred there based on witness testimony and data analysis.
For people saying that no fraud occurred-if given the same facts, and the court ruled that fraud DID occur, would you change your view that fraud occurred?
Again fraud enough to over turn the election. We have not seen any evidence of this @AdvanceManExtraordinaire
No one ever said elections were perfect @AdvanceManExtraordinaire
I guess there was a lack of trust on the part of republican poll watchers - but probably no violations of state law there
Witness testimony and data analysis doesn’t prove definitive fraud. Especially from crazy partisans. You have to go the extra step and prove the fraud alleged.
There was lack in trust in the election ever since Trump declared the elections would be fraudulent. He primed his base to believe it. So now everything looks like fraud to them @Friedrich
having Abrams and her sister involved in all this doesn't help either. Republicans are saying Abrams was actually in charge of anything related to voting in GA 😆
Yeah that was something to be addressed kinda
Although in terms of there being machine related fraud or election or voter fraud in GA. This is not the case
right - more related to ballot harvesting if I remember right
Not that I heard anyone talking about
Ga was kraken central
What type of influence did Facebook potentially have on the elections? I heard they made some massive donations, and maybe they targeted dems to get out and vote?
Again probably nothing illegal there 😆
They made donations to the state
To the tune of....?
The state used that money for secure election
400 Million perhaps?
Training etc
Yeah god forbid we have companies that have given money in the past to election security to give money again
Well mark zuckerbeg specifically
“$250 million, will go to the Center for Tech and Civic Life, a nonprofit popular with many tech philanthropists, which will then regrant the money to local election officials so they can recruit poll workers, supply them with personal protective equipment, and set up drive-through voting. Another $50 million heads to the Center for Election Innovation & Research to be distributed to Secretaries of State across the country”
All the states trump won didn’t count because all their SOS got money from good old Mark zuck
makes sense