Doesn't mean I didn't think that was a fringe opinion.

What? My dude, that is literally what protest is.

Civil unrest.

Redress of grievances.

I think motive and fear matters a lot there. If I'm surrounded by an angry mob and my car windows are getting smashed out.. yes I am running them over. If I run them over without any justified fear then yes murder.

Does the right denounce violence on bkth sides, yes or no.

Does the left denounce violence on both sides, yes or no.

Sure, I agree when they're smashing your car/windows in, you can gun it. They were simply saying that the fact that they're in the road blocking their path was enough to run them over.

If you answer that question HONESTLY. Then you have what I'm talking about. Not "peaceful protests"

Yes.

Yes.

You're getting caught up in the partisan talking points.

if you're moving at all in a car protesters will say you're trying to kill them lol

@Friedrich, you just advanced to level 6!

you better turn the car off

I appreciate your thorough response.

- This point is actually false. There were only temporary changes made under emergency powers granted by the legislatures to the Secretary of State, Secretary of the Commonwealth, and/or election boards to ensure the safe, secure, and fair elections. These were tested in the courts all the way to the state SC and to the US SC in some cases. RWM kept describing this as going against the legislation, it just simply isn't true. The changes were temporary for this election cycle only.
- WI Indefinitely Confined. This, too, was litigated and determined that people could determine for themselves if this was their circumstance. They clearly could not do it to avoid showing ID. If the Trump campaign wanted to prove fraud, they could have investigated and determined if these individuals did not have ID. I am guessing it is pretty easy to check the DMV records against the voting records to find individuals who did not have ID.
- Signature verification - I have yet to find a single jurisdiction where this is true and the Trump campaign has made this claim about every battleground state. If you have any information about places that did not verify signatures, I would love to see it. So far, nobody has been able to provide a credible accounting of this.
- The FBI/Trump Campaign have had Braynard's findings for a couple of months now. I followed his efforts closely and had some concerns about his methodology, but was very interested in where it would lead. I expected that there would be some arrests that came out of it. He claimed to find people that said they didn't vote, tho ballots were cast. The FBI or Trump PI's should've been able to build cases by now. The longer it has taken, the more I am certain there was nothing to it.

With around 60 elections, there are statistical anomalies each time. The focus on bellwether outcomes could also mean that Trump campaigned there to make sure he won in order to bolster his claims of victory.

When you look at that the hypocrisy is astounding

You're referring to the 7 percent in one image, and the 93 percent in the other image.

You can't do that.

just keep a BLM hat in your car for emergencies in case you get stuck in something lol

You think I'm referring to one image. Its An Example. Don't play dumb, you're not.

It's not a fair example. If you're going to compare the worst of two images, then look at the worst of both events.

Low key a very solid strat

I don't agree that it's the worst day in American history obviously.

But that comparison alone is questionable at best.

You're missing every point I've made to excuse your side. In essence you're proving my point.

Never excused my side though.

But then if we take one picture from every antifa / BLM riot we don’t have many comparison pictures....

yea in Wi they had both so it is just insane for anyone to think they did not do just that. They refusal to even so much to look into it and say none of this happens is nuts. just the perfect storm for Fraud...

Mmkay.

Oh you can get plenty of BLM pictures that would look awful, 100%, it was something that lasted 9 months.

Thats what I’m saying. We maybe have 4 comparison photos at best (of separate events).. and then it’s no longer a comparison, it’s just antifa /BLM alone. If that makes sense...

The idea of the image is to make as strong a contrast to opposing ideologies/ideas.

To the point where it's disingenuous in my opinion.

Because there is so much context left out.

I know what you mean

I wish antifa would quit using those green lasers to blind people - doesn't seem right

Sure. I think also is used to point out the hypocrisy a little.

Which isn’t bad

And I agree the left has been hypocritical.