Message from @Watching the Watchers
Discord ID: 799133780148879360
I think satire is illegal now 😆
I went to the mall again the next day. They were making the store mop up the 'mess' , I don't know why but I expected there to be a service or crew for that.
I can have that same thing by forgetting that I took my meds and taking them again. 😉
However, when I turned 21 I wanted to have a hang-over so I could get it out of my system. I didn't get a headache but I felt like there was a railroad tie in my chest. Took me an hour to turn over and crawl to the bathroom.
😐
Fortunately I was in the Army and there were plenty of experienced men around to make sure I survived myself.
Heyyyooo thanks for your service.
They are not Americans.
Ok Torquemada
Is that expression or are you being literal.
To be an American one must hold to the principle of the Constitution as an ethic. A Leftist cannot have an ethic. That is why they cannot be hypocrites. They have no moral standard to which they could aspire.
Okay. So an expression...
A standard.
I'm sorry. That is an ignorant position and patently offensive. It's people that refused to accept reality that led to what happened 1/6. In my opinion, the only logical conclusion that can reasonably be made, at this point, is that the only election fraud that was perpetrated was by Donald Trump on the American people by lying about the results.
I'm not saying that it is impossible for fraud to have been committed... It's that there has been no credible proof of it, at this point.
You are correct. The Left never accepted that Trump was elected in 2016 and they did everything they could both in coordinated cells and as solo actors to make sure he would not get elected again. He was reelected since all of their activities are illegitimate.
I think I may have found the James of the right.
I hear Trump will sit in for another Term
That is a lie. There has been no proof allowed to be brought before the courts and the Left obstructed investigations until they could destroy, remove, or replace the evidence.
@Whithers Thank you for providing the archetype to which we can point. You do a great service, sir.
There has been plenty of cases that allowed evidence to be presented. It just didn't stand up to scrutiny. It's easily verifiable.
If the election had been legitimate the nanosecond there was a question the Dems would have thrown open the machines and records for review by every person on the planet. They did not. They obstructed because they are guilty.
No, there have been none.
You are misinformed.
I am not.
'The Dems' aren't in charge of 'throwing open the machines.' It doesn't work like that, slick.
Yes, they were, since they owned the machines.
Lmao
told ron johnson I won't vote for him again.
Did they rule on the evidence or just present it?
He ruled on the evidence... Point by point.
Lmfao that's legit
its coming
Hahahahahahaha