I bookmarked it and will look I to the case tomorrow. :)

@LadyLuv2020🌅, you just advanced to level 2!

When a judge says I’ve looked at your evidence and it’s speculative meritless drivel not based on any compelling legal argument so there’s not a point to continuing they are viewing your evidence. They just aren’t so easily fooled 😂

Although my favorite judge would certainly be the one the told Rudy and Jenna they shouldn’t be practicing law 🍿

Also depends on the political leanings of the judge and political pressure. But I haven't read it yet, and dont know what was claimed with in it

A wide variety of Trump appointed judges said Id like some evidence but you are giving me none

Have you honestly sat through and watched the hearings? That is what I have based my opinion thus far.

Yes they can get away with far more when not under oath when their testimony conflicts with their affidavit

And not news reels. The entire thing.

They signed affidavits this was not some Senate or house show boating and listening to themselves give speeches.

I am not here to argue anyway. I just have listened to all of the hearings in every state present evidence they had hoping for a day in court.

I would give more credit to showboating politicians. Signing affidavits doesn’t mean much. Especially when testimony doesn’t match the affidavit. But even the “experts” caught committing perjury aren’t facing changes let alone random scrubs.

https://twitter.com/politicalwilli/status/1349083364729360384?s=19

Tell me which ones didn't match and post the affidavit.

I dont have Twitter but I will look into that one tomorrow too

Good night. :(

:)

Mellissa Carones wasn’t even remotely close

She certainly made a fuss about signing something that made it illegal to lie 😂

When you are before state congress not under oath you can just say whatever doesn’t remotely match your affidavit and there’s no repercussions

They tried to put them under oath in MI and they flipped out and said nope I need to be able to lie sir

Perhaps it's because the counties with minorities are also the ones with the highest populations? The lack of prosecution doesn't alleviate questions regarding these issues.

It's not surprising that heavily Democrat areas will vote Democrat, but that doesn't explain away every issue.

For example, in PA, it was expected that Democrats would have a higher % of the mail-ins, but that was because they requested the most absentee ballots. When you look at the numbers, Biden got 117% of the Democrat returned ballots. Ok, fine I suppose that's possible (non-Dems voting for Biden), but what does that actually look like. He would need 95% of the Dem vote, 21% of the Republican vote, and over 80% of the Independent vote. Or, he would need 100% of the Dem vote, 98% of Indep. vote and 2.3% of the Repub. vote (this presumes only Repubs voted for Trump). Wow, extremely impressive results. Let's not look into them. Also, I seem to remember a claim of batches totaling 570,000 votes for Biden vs 3,200 for Trump over a short period of time. I have yet to find a "debunk" for that one. Who knows.

They didn't have paper ballots for every state/county. In GA, the paper ballots are generated by the machine. So you're at the mercy of people's carelessness (which is egregious, for most people). That's what their "risk limiting audit" was, a recount of those print outs.

And when GA did do an absentee signature match audit, they didn't do it for the main county in question, Fulton LOL. In the words of the President-elect, "C'mon man!"

Once again, Trump didn't convince me that things were off. I, myself convinced me they were off because these irregularities stuck out to me. If Trump said from the beginning that there likely wasn't fraud, I wouldn't have believed him. Ok? lol

The media sways public opinion and judges are sensitive to that.

As a finance person, if the SEC doesn't trust your numbers, they're going to demand to see all your "facts" and no BS will stop them.

I don't think private investigators can gain access to the info they need, but maybe I'm wrong?

But does it matter? The video from the State Farm Arena which showed voting continuing after the observers went home was answered with a simple "They weren't told to go home, the counting process was legit. No fraud. Debunked. Bye."

Cool, ok.

What on earth is 117% of Democrat returned ballots? Whatever ballots were returned is 100% 😂

In other words, if we presume he received 100% of the Democrat ballots returned, he also received an additional 17% of that number.

I worded that part weirdly, I'll admit.

I made a spreadsheet because I wanted to look into this more, but I couldn't find the data I needed.

PA provided a breakdown of mail-in ballots by registration, but they didn't do the same for in-person votes. I wanted to compare them.

I recommend not doing this lol.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/man-injected-himself-magic-mushrooms-230525222.html

There was a good number of GOP voters that showed up to vote Biden and the mailin ballots had a heavy lean towards Biden which is part was due to Trump voters not taking pandemic seriously

Perhaps. I don't see how the method of voting itself (irrespective of registration) would skew so heavily in one direction.

Many Republicans do take the pandemic seriously and many Republicans vote absentee in general. From my understanding, Republicans have always utilized absentee ballots in decent numbers. For this election it was supposed to favor Democrats because the numbers showed more Democrats requested them.

As I said last night, I usually vote absentee and did this time as well. Except this time I physically dropped my ballot off because I didn't trust my mailman lol.

Republicans used absentee more until their candidate made it a big deal to not use the system. This lead to a huge skew in the mail in system which carried over to independents and party switchers. Trump conversely got more in person votes from outside the party percentage wise

That doesn't really add up for me though. Sure, he said not to because of issues that could occur, but that doesn't somehow translate to Republicans that did use absentee ballots being Biden voters. It would translate to more Democrats requesting/returning absentee ballots, which was the case.

@DangerousFreedom more democrats took the pandemic seriously especially in the city where more democrat votes come from. Also republicans made laws that you can’t count mail ins until after the close of polls. Trump kept telling republicans not to vote by mail. Democrats were encouraged to vote by mail and vote early. They did this in cities. Taking all this information in it was predicted that we would get the red mirage. We would see a flood of republican votes in voting day. Then after the polls close they would count all the mail ins. The mail Ins came from cities that primarily vote Democrat. https://youtu.be/rvyxzq9-dpo

That was true in PA, but what about GA? They're a smaller state than mine, FL, and the only difference was they couldn't run the tabulations till election night. That process is with a computer, yet somehow they were SEVERAL days behind FL with counts.

Like 300k Dems fed up with lockdown votes Trump. Like 300k GOP deeply concerned with poor COVID response voted Biden. The former would prefer in person. The latter mailins.

Same with GA. Cities vote blue there. There was a huge effort made by democrats to make sure people were signed up and ready to go. @DangerousFreedom

FL allows mail in votes to be counted before polls close @DangerousFreedom

That's what "must" have happened, but it seems unlikely to me.

Remember, he grew his votes from 2016. So Republicans were clearly voting Republican, regardless of the method.

Election counting laws are different in states. Also bigger states take longer to count in general. California , NY, Texas were still at 99 percents days to weeks after nov 3 @DangerousFreedom