Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 632988282069844029
@MaxIgnoramus yes, this somehow dtarted over my comment
To. @Deleted User
@Deleted User Iām just asking for your source
The source was Wikipedia
*waves*
@Deleted User het
Okay, so can be changed by anyone
Hey
hey max
@Deleted User hello
@Deleted User. Waves back
hey bible
hi @NoOne
Wikipedia is not a reliable source
it's pretty decent
@Deleted User a stopped clock is right twice a day
wikipedia is sure better than encyclopedias
Not really it a beta test on control of information
well censorship of more controversial views is mostly from the public self enforcing
@Deleted User. Then use the wayback machine
@Deleted User. Wayback
didn't capture everything
@Deleted User Dont rely on Wiki then, rely on the facts; in any scenario, factual details prior to Wikipedia aren't a creation of Wikipedia *(that would implicate Wiki as a promoter of facts in such cases).* Step ur game up & research as I have. Burden is on y'all to verify verifiable details when it correlates to your presupposed doubt. š That's all
Don't be lazy
@Deleted Useragreed
so what's everyone's opinion on free energy tech?
@Deleted User @Deleted User
I have to agree with Operator on this. Wiki can be changed, false info, and simply trolled on.
@Deleted User Free energy?
yeah
@MaskedHeathen Right on bro
š
@MaskedHeathen. Wiki is a good starting point
No it ain't.
is free energy tech real or no?
Even a liberal college student can tell you that.
@Deleted User mmmmm no.
@Deleted User. Some
no? really?
There is no machine that operates outside of the law of thermodynamics
So free energy is not possible