imagine

i still get giddy over it lmao

You actually do weed<:CursedEmoji:763140778770825247>

oh shit. i think i saw you mentioning you have asthma earlier today. was it the asthma medication, or something else?

Yes, I'm stoned currently.

It was childhood asthma basically caused by shit air quality where we lived

what city?

oof. that sucks. are you planning to move eventually or no?

It was in England, if I remember right it was something about living in a low part of the land, all the bad air kinda tended to settle there. We moved away from there when I was 10, but for a few years as a small kid I was carrying an inhaler with me.

Bad air coming from London?

Sad

poor mike

Might have been, I believe there was also some manufacturing done near where we lived

It sucked because before we moved to England I was pretty athletic, was very active in martial arts, and then when we got there it felt like I just couldn't breathe, ended up going to the doctor after an asthma attack, he was the one that told us about the air quality.

I'm tempted to post a paper I wrote on 2A

<:Dude:726878886411108474>

Grape Job

Ah....nice hot coffee

oh my

Lots of words...no spamming....sum it up; though you make a solid point

anti-gun destroyed

Yooo wtf

Chill out with the walls of text

I'm done

I wish I could do it in one post

Ok. I am practicing being a mod

so it would not be spam

but it is physically impossible to make it one message

sorry

Wait till a liberal comes

Sum it up.

And make the point

If they want concrete proof. Deal with them with your concrete message

Wall of messages per se and hope that they read it and change their mind

I meant dm them

Slide in their dms

<:Nervous_Monkey:797288817115267082>

who is sliding into whose dm?

Okay, I’m a centrist and I’m gonna read it.

Here is my stance and I’ll tell you so you can see if you convince me.

The only thing you should need to purchase a handgun is a form of identification. Automatic Rifles and shotguns on the other hand should have a background check, a mental health check, and other things. This process should take as long as it needs to make sure the person can use it responsible. My reasoning is this. I want a compromise between both sides. I think both arguments are pretty valid, what if you need to defend yourself, and mentally unstable people shouldn’t get these hand on there weapons. I think to please argument 1, we can have so low fire rate weapons, hand guns, low power bolt actions weapons, and revolvers. This is so people can feel safe and be able to protect them selfs when ever the feel necessary, no waiting times, just go to gun store and bam you can protect your self. On the other hand, I think we should have a long mental evaluation for weapons that can cause more damage. That’s my opinion on gun control @jis6 what do you think?

as a fellow centrist, I agree it seems reasonable. But who is the person who decides someone is not mentally healthy enough to purchase a firearm? But I do agree some level of mental health check should be necessary for purchasing a Semi-Automatic Rifle or Pump Action Shotgun

I think a handgun requires background check because Handguns can cause just as much problems as a Rifle