Message from Livingstone in JDMOONAN's DUNK SQUAD! #youtube-general
@AlexanderTorri at least you're thinking, that's more than most.
Definitely not selling myself short, just accepting of my own limitations
The future is up to people who can still have civil discourse.
And agree and disagree without coming to violence.
Your strengths fill in the gaps for someone else. I would be a shit leader but I am a great doer. I make things happen. I get people to do things and work together. Those are my strengths. I make things happen but I can’t be the face of a movement. I wish I could be. But it’s not for me.
Or personal attacks.
My belief is you should only use the methods and tactics utilized by the others to challenge. Anything beyond or less is necessary. Fight democracy ideology with democracy ideology. Fight republic ideology with republic ideology. Fight totalitarian ideology with totalitarian ideology.
Play the game being played, you know?
I would always rather maintain a position of integrity. But the phrase fight fire with fire exist for a reason.
I am all about integrity
I agree 100% there
Goodnight everyone ☺️
Hope to chat again!
@Humanoid Typhoon I would have agreed a few days ago, but the people entering the capitol that did no harm to anyone, bared no weapons, didn't destroy the place, and someone got killed and they got DEFAMED and destroyed on social media makes me now think different.
It doesn't matter at all how civil you are with your protests, you will be labelled a white-supremist evil terrorist regardless what you do or don't do.
That is why 230 needs to be repealed.
It’s no longer about conflicting information it’s about false narratives to persuade the masses to believe things that are simply not true.
I'll leave a thought for later:
The problem is fighting one ideology with the constraints of another is apparent. If you look at Alinsky's rules for radicals, they exploit this weakness to gain a foothold.
Before you go to bed — there was no flaw or loophole in changing election law by circumventing the legislature, no? I feel this was synonymous to the time Dick Cheney shot that guy in the ass during a hunting trip and the guy apologized to him for being in the way!!
I will look into it. I try not to look at anything through the lens of my ideology. I am a right leaning independent. If I have to take an opposing view of mine to persuade somebody else that they are wrong then I will do it. The truth should never be constrained by an ideology.
I firmly believe the facts should standalone. Facts do not need interpretation.
Once the fact has been interpreted it is no longer a fact and it’s an opinion.
Facts need a day in fckn court
It's more of a tactic of I'm going to make you play by your rule set but I'm not. @Livingstone
But I’m also very OK with being wrong. I am a 1000% Grade A Fuck up.
Oooo. That Will be fun to read!
Ooo. That does sound lovely.
I urge people to read Alinsky's but not because I appreciate his work and apply it to my life. It's more of a know thy enemy type relationship lol.
That is very important. I never like to go to something unprepared. I always try to make sure that I am familiar and preferably confident in opposing viewpoints prior to engaging. People’s views can and should be used against them to expose how there are potential flaws.
Don’t get me wrong. Everything man made has the potential to be flawed.
His last paragraph in his book forward sums things up.
Once you get to know his works then you can do a little adventure and see what important political figures in the US studied under his tutelage and the bigger picture will become more clear.
Are you familiar with... GOTV And MiniVan?