if you send me the information on the studies you mtntioned, I would be happy to look at them

I apply the reasoning though to most all studies.

LOL... the reasoning is IN the study...

Nothing has to be a fact just cuz it was heavily studied and gave a result

Again... WATCH the show...

THEN tell me what you think

Like we know, things eventually get changed or refuted, even if it takes hundreds of years.

Since neither of us has conducted such a study ourselves we must rely on others

OMG...

You are really unwilling to open your mind and watch the show....

That's sad

nor have you send me links to any relevant studies...

That I never said

I didn't say I'm willing to watch it, you're inferring that

Then watch the show... and send me your studies...

I'm talking now about ANY study on anything

But I'll save that discussion.

If you are unwilling to believe any study on anything then you are gonna have a really tough time...

our lives are bassed on studies...

Just because they are studies does not mean they are wrong

and until you see the research, you won't know.

Again, something I didn't say

I didn't say I couldn't personally believe any study, I'm saying something doesn't have to be factual just because a study was done

well.... instead of arguing that it's just studies, you COULD say, OK... I'll watch it. And here is my study for you to review...

that would be much more helpful!!

I can believe a study whilst at the same time understanding it might not be fully factual and always be factual for eternity

Many things are factual because a study has been done...

LOL

And I never said a study is wrong for being a study

it is a FACT that male genetic material is what determines the sex of a baby...

in contrast to what they used to think...

So again... the ONLY way you can know if you believe the assertion or not is to review the study...

Well, if they USED to think that (meaning a former fact), how do we know a current fact won't change to an updated fact ?

We have to determine what the definition of fact is. Is a fact eternal, or can a fact be changed into a new fact based on new understanding ?

http://www.documentarytube.com/videos/dogs-decoded

Because back then they didn't know about cells, alleles and genetics... now we do

just because knowledge changes does not mean something can not become fact

And aren't there further things of which we don't yet know ?

You're always sounding like we've reached the absolute pinnacle of what we can know

when you learn about things you can't see, such as alleles, then you are able to answer questions