Do you guys think a woman would be more respectful to a man if their primary providing source was social status and not financial if they were to marry?.. on the basis that social status is a resource that isin't tangible and a loss of relationship would be a loss of the resource.. I know in many instances that social staus may have a high correlation to financial success but what about in the hypothetical sense that someone has high social status and low monetary value..
@Morgan no they would be just as bitchy. they would be nicer in public and make the relationship look as ideal as possible if that was more important. but in private they would be just as bad. worse prolly
I think they can be seperable, the circumstance i am thinking of however is people around their 20s so perhaps when older it changes to becoming inseperable as financial is to be more expected.
@Morgan I mean “wealthy” is also subjective too. It could mean a minimalist who has no debt and can take care of himself. Which by today’s standards would be considered well off, but idk about wealthy
