Message from @DankChum
Discord ID: 585124303935242241
So if the monarch wants to spread feminism, and/or a superpower pressures him to do so, he'll do that even if 90% of the people oppose feminism
And everyone else gets to "swallow a shoe and shut up!"
I think the problem with monarchy is the nature of who is in charge. sometimes you get someone who has a real interest in keeping the people alive, and other times you get boomer mentality and they spend everyone's money and collapse the state
but there is some merit in the trichotomy description that says something like "because the ruler owns the people, he has vested interest in maintaining his sovereignty" in the same way that owning a car makes you want to keep it clean and running
Are we discussing this again? Just fucking crown me Emperor.
It doesn't matter how much you want to keep it clean if you are shit at maintaining a car.
There are Alot of people who are shit at maintaining a car.
Also. Power corrupts. This is an absolute truth. It always happens
Power doesn't corrupt. Power reveals.
yeah I'm not for monarchy if you read my full message, I am saying though that it has a better track record than communism
anarchy has a better track record
anarchy exists for like 1 day and then tribalism replaces it
Unless you realize that communism has done exactly what it intended to do every time.
In which case, it has been real communism every time and has had resounding success every time.
I'm talking about theoretical in the same way that I was discussing theoretical monarchy
I'm saying communism intends to commit genocide and mass murder.
yeah all roads lead further into the honk but I could say the same thing about monarchy/democracy/anarchy etc
because all lead to genocide if taken down the natural path
communism is just the fast lane
There's a difference between "there's been genocide in all cases" and "they all do it by design"
maybe I'm just optimistic but I think most communists are people who cant think ahead, and only a few see where it leads and choose that path
I think that is optimistic.
I think they are ignorant or greedy.
they just want gibs but most that I've talked to dont understand where the gibs come from. they're not intending to eat the rich they think that money can be made out of nothing
so they just become the rich
ignorant
yeah but not genocidal by thoughts
just by actions
@shadowlessnexus good point
you should not in life. place your future. in something as frail and ever changing as a person. you should place it in yourself.
uhh
That's the fatal flaw of monarchy
the problem with putting the responsibility on yourself is that you have to actually take responsibility. that's hard and bottom feeders cant face that
Let them fail then
they're bringing you down with them as we speak
anyway individualitism(?) is dumb as well because by nature we are social animals. the food we hunt goes bad before a single person can eat it all, and without at least a tribe there is rarely anything substantial built that isnt immediately destroyed by another individual
societies are built by teams but the leader gets the blame for the slackers fault.
Individualism doesn't mean complete social isolation, just giving as much freedom as possible to the individual
tribalism?
tribalism is in constant war
but it has some good progress in early stages due to arms races