Also Arabic for goat shenanigans I believe is "حيل العنزة"

Huh.... Kinda looks like a goat

@Sheer how does a monarchy work to help feminists?

Wait, is it because the monarch is trying to look humanitarian and is giving a voice to the harpies?

@Xychotic no, because a monarch is basically a dictator, and he'll do whatever he sees fit regardless of the people's opinion, moreover it's easier for a foreign superpower to put pressure on and control of a local monarch as apposed to a democracy or a Republic

So... How is this letting feminists take over?

So if the monarch wants to spread feminism, and/or a superpower pressures him to do so, he'll do that even if 90% of the people oppose feminism

And everyone else gets to "swallow a shoe and shut up!"

I think the problem with monarchy is the nature of who is in charge. sometimes you get someone who has a real interest in keeping the people alive, and other times you get boomer mentality and they spend everyone's money and collapse the state

but there is some merit in the trichotomy description that says something like "because the ruler owns the people, he has vested interest in maintaining his sovereignty" in the same way that owning a car makes you want to keep it clean and running

Are we discussing this again? Just fucking crown me Emperor.

It doesn't matter how much you want to keep it clean if you are shit at maintaining a car.

There are Alot of people who are shit at maintaining a car.

Also. Power corrupts. This is an absolute truth. It always happens

Power doesn't corrupt. Power reveals.

yeah I'm not for monarchy if you read my full message, I am saying though that it has a better track record than communism

anarchy has a better track record

anarchy exists for like 1 day and then tribalism replaces it

Unless you realize that communism has done exactly what it intended to do every time.

In which case, it has been real communism every time and has had resounding success every time.

I'm talking about theoretical in the same way that I was discussing theoretical monarchy

I'm saying communism intends to commit genocide and mass murder.

yeah all roads lead further into the honk but I could say the same thing about monarchy/democracy/anarchy etc

because all lead to genocide if taken down the natural path

communism is just the fast lane

There's a difference between "there's been genocide in all cases" and "they all do it by design"

maybe I'm just optimistic but I think most communists are people who cant think ahead, and only a few see where it leads and choose that path

I think that is optimistic.

I think they are ignorant or greedy.

they just want gibs but most that I've talked to dont understand where the gibs come from. they're not intending to eat the rich they think that money can be made out of nothing

so they just become the rich

ignorant

yeah but not genocidal by thoughts

just by actions

@shadowlessnexus good point

you should not in life. place your future. in something as frail and ever changing as a person. you should place it in yourself.

uhh

That's the fatal flaw of monarchy

the problem with putting the responsibility on yourself is that you have to actually take responsibility. that's hard and bottom feeders cant face that

Let them fail then

they're bringing you down with them as we speak