They use people like him and Cuomo has pawns to say “we don’t hate Catholics look at Cuomo and Biden” even though they are both not catholic

I see that we should end the FICA tax for anyone being paid less than 20k annually. Even if someone is paid minimum wage, the FICA tax would drastically lower the amount. This is just my opinion on minimum wage as it does not increase or decrease the demand for workers as the employer is paying the same. Currently, FICA tax is at 7.65%. I am being paid 10$ an hour, or around 17,680$ annually, but FICA currently takes out 1,352$. This amount of money could easily buy many necessities.
Another point I want to make is, why does every other tax on a person involve levels to their annual income, the more you make the more on percent you are tax, but FICA is the same for all earning groups.
How does this sound as a workaround for the fight between increaseing/decreaseing minimum wage?

How much do you get back at tax time?

lets just say, I have nice employers, and we have a nice table we talk under

im just useing it as an example

You would get back nearly all of that $1,352

Single parents get back much more than that if they're under the poverty line

well, i tried. thank you

I'm all for changing the tax code

yea, I wished it was leveled like many others

I'd rather we go for a flat tax

No loopholes

I don't even care if its "flat"
Do that, and restructure our overall spending to get us outta the red.

Are the discord mods doing something? Is that why nobody can see pictures and it just says (insert something here).Jpeg

Or is it just my discord being retarded.

If pictures are being posted but no image, that's discord being borked, we allow images

how many mods are there

Should Tyler Zed Invite No BS for a YouTube livestream at some point this month or Jan 2021?

Does anyone still watch No BS?

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

I dont. A lot of people take a lot of issue with him, and I dont remember why.

I haven't seen any of his vids in a long time. I thought he got banned or something.

So abortion.... so if you kill a pregnant woman it counts as 2 counts of manslaughter but if you get an abortion its safe and legal!!!!

How does that make any sense!?!?!?!

Well. A child is not a human child if the parent(s) doesnt want it

Not true what so ever @isoboto

To allege that a child is not human until the parents want it is a modern obscenely absurd fairy tale. If you actually believe that you are so deceived!!!

According to his theory orphans are not children @DannyNC1

Right. It is delusional. You see, the thing is, once people legally permitted the abhorrent murder of children in the womb, all sorts of other insane things come along to prop it up, like this prevalent lie that has been pushed on people. To answer your question, one part of law recognizes an unborn baby is a real person, by charging 2 counts of manslaughter in said situation, but in another for reasons of convenience it is 'just a clump of cells.' Nazis went to absurd justifications for their abhorrent practices that if framed in objective situations would show what they really are.

But, no, the law doesn't make sense on that, because they've left absolute moral standards for basis of law long ago.

Exactly

And another flaw with his theory... what about parents that kill their children

Just because they didn't want their kinds doesn't mean that they aren't human

Again, the moral standards--more specifically, the Judeo-Christian standards that the American government has been founded on, once they have been departed from, then it's like a moral Pandora's Box, to unleash all sorts of horrible situations for people to justify doing what they want.

Thank you for agreeing with me

I can't imagine a word without children

And that is what's happening in our world right now

Well, anyone grounded in how to properly assess things, more specifically, as I said, with Judeo-Christian values, will understand and agree. Once those are gone, anything is game. What really is the only reason we don't just kill senior adults or mentally disabled in euthanasia out of convenience? "Thou shalt not kill." Once that's out of the equation, then the practice Dems and Europeans have been wanting is fully acceptable (and already being used). Same with other things. Moral values are the checks to society from becoming paganized terrible places to live. If people are allowed to choose their values, anything is justifiable. Even cannibalism is justifiable to some people. But not with the Bible.

It's terrifying but the left already used the logic that parents can kill their unborn children because they would have a hard life because of disabilities or even just economic hardships. As Zaley brought up, I unfortunately don't see it outside the possibility they orphans or disabled kids could one day could be put down for their "own good". You already have that example with the socialized medicine in the UK, were the government wouldn't allow the parents to take the kid out of the country to get a new treatments because they determined the kid should just be kept comfortable and be allowed to die even when a cure was possible.

Wasnt the "Thou shalt not kill" quote actually longer, and something like "Thou shalt not kill without reason/needlessly/in cold blood"? or am I wrong? Because if someone tries to harm your family, harm you, or kill either... its justified to kill them in self defense.

oh i know. i disagree with the line of thought. but it's a sentiment that they use to explain abortion