Message from @ZSLiby Studios
Discord ID: 778016418389557249
damn I've been wondering for a long time and I never got a straight answer thank you!
The 8 year term does not have to be consecutive.
awesome thanks for the confirmation!
Now, there are some loopholes to get around the 8 year term limit, and some that I think need to be fixed. The biggest one was something people thought Biden would do, and that was make Obama the VP. Meaning that if something happened to Biden, Obama would get to be president again without it being illegal.
@ZSLiby Studios Are you sure that’s legal? I’m pretty sure that’s illegal because to be vice president you have to have every qualification of being president, and if your time is president has expired then I would think that you couldn’t be vice president
No, it's perfectly legal
Nope, it is illegal
lmao
22nd Admendment
VPs can be pres but pres can't be VP
bsically?
Hey, I can be wrong at times, right? At least I admitted I was wrong.
Yeah
already a better person than half of the world
What if Obama took Nancy pelosi's position then Biden and Kamala got Hillaryied? That would make Obama president again.
Obviously not going to happen but what would happen then.
Obama still couldn't be president again.
Both the 12th and 22nd Amendments say that nobody who has been president for 2 terms can be president again.
12th says that?
I'm pretty sure it was just a formality until FDR had 4 terms and made the 22nd ammendment
12 outlines how they're elected
I don't think it includes term limits
otherwise FDR wouldn't have been able to have 4 terms right?
Maybe
There was no law against a president serving more then 2 terms till after FDR died in office.
Also, there has been a President before who won his first run, lost his second run, then won his third run. (Grover Cleveland)
sorry I forgot Roosevelt died in office. I just remembered it was made because of him
Children should not be used as a face for a political movement. Besides that, with the left habit of causing violence, I'd be scared kids would get hurt. We know Antifa has no problem beating weaker people.
Agreed
I think only when you are armed
I may keep myself responsibly armed whenever I'm out but I still wouldn't want to subject any kid of mine or any kid to an unnecessary situation where defensive use would be needed.
I did take my oldest to see the VP last month. She's 18 and still in HS but it was pretty much a once in a lifetime opportunity. We saw kids there and I thought that, while it's their right, kids should know what they're hearing about before they go to a rally of the political nature.
18 is old enough to vote so at that point I think it is upto them and you as a parent. However anything younger then say 16 I think is a problem.
Depends on the age. 13 and older is what i say
^
Yeah, I wouldn’t take a 6 year old or anything, but if there a lot older and are interested in politics, why not?
If Antifa didn't exist, sure take your kid.
Unfortunately, we live in a dangerous environment for political expression, and a dutiful parent should recognize the danger.
True
Yea I would say about 13 and up
Personally I wouldn't mind going as a 16 year old