communism that is decentralized would be the future of humanity imo

change would come gradually

anti-authoritarian communism

Possibly yes. I notice most science fiction stories depict a kind of Socialist utopia or dystopia. Likely not a coincidence.

the individual, not the state is where power should be vested in

Future technology makes what seems improbable now more likely

the transitionary stage would be free-market socialism without rulers

A nanotech assembler in each household that could make almost anything needed just input raw materials

As an example

personal property aka property that does not exploit others, would stay yours

aka your house would stay yours

Mmhmm

the goal would be to promote freedom and equality in all spheres of human existence

marx

's

communism is authoritarian

Yahs I have a problem with authoritarianism.

And social hierarchy

The soviet union and china show the failures of Marxism

> The soviet union and china show the failures of Marxism
@eh Ⓐ Agreed

> @Mine Excadrill ancaps are not anarchist
@eh Ⓐ I firstly want to say I'm not anarchist at all, but in my personal opinion ancaps are more anarchist than anarcho communists. Because in order to have communism you must have a state to control the distribution of wealth and the production of goods. In an anarcho-communist system well there is no government so what government will control the production?

> @eh Ⓐ I firstly want to say I'm not anarchist at all, but in my personal opinion ancaps are more anarchist than anarcho communists. Because in order to have communism you must have a state to control the distribution of wealth and the production of goods. In an anarcho-communist system well there is no government so what government will control the production?
@President-Elect bhcowboy the state is not needed for communism

eg your family is a commune

is the state in your family?

But you can't have wide spread communism

communes should be decentralized

I see your point but it still necessarily isn't communism

Communism must have a state.

anarchism was first used to describe libertarian socialism

But still communism must have a state

Karl Marx would agree

Anyway I have to go

karl marx isn't the founder of ancom

it's peter kropotkin

proudhon criticized marx

I know this

My point was to have true socialism or communism you must have a state

https://s3.superiorservers.co/forums/monthly_2020_10/Screenshot_20201023-122617_Chrome.thumb.jpg.c72317a50964e8ddb71189c2cee3c551.jpg

https://cdn.tanners.space/HcUV

https://cdn.tanners.space/Dn9R

This is the second leftist I found in this server today <:benshapirolasereyes:736783642205880320>

Been subbed to Zeducation for a while now, only just decided to join the Discord today

Was a conservative before a lefty