Message from @Jade (Yumi)
Discord ID: 778317202981781554
other cities there were syndicalist
That sits fine by me. I'm interested in seeing if UBI would work.
ubi wouldn't
communism that is decentralized would be the future of humanity imo
change would come gradually
anti-authoritarian communism
Possibly yes. I notice most science fiction stories depict a kind of Socialist utopia or dystopia. Likely not a coincidence.
the individual, not the state is where power should be vested in
Future technology makes what seems improbable now more likely
the transitionary stage would be free-market socialism without rulers
A nanotech assembler in each household that could make almost anything needed just input raw materials
As an example
personal property aka property that does not exploit others, would stay yours
aka your house would stay yours
Mmhmm
the goal would be to promote freedom and equality in all spheres of human existence
marx
's
communism is authoritarian
Yahs I have a problem with authoritarianism.
The soviet union and china show the failures of Marxism
> The soviet union and china show the failures of Marxism
@eh Ⓐ Agreed
> @Mine Excadrill ancaps are not anarchist
@eh Ⓐ I firstly want to say I'm not anarchist at all, but in my personal opinion ancaps are more anarchist than anarcho communists. Because in order to have communism you must have a state to control the distribution of wealth and the production of goods. In an anarcho-communist system well there is no government so what government will control the production?
> @eh Ⓐ I firstly want to say I'm not anarchist at all, but in my personal opinion ancaps are more anarchist than anarcho communists. Because in order to have communism you must have a state to control the distribution of wealth and the production of goods. In an anarcho-communist system well there is no government so what government will control the production?
@President-Elect bhcowboy the state is not needed for communism
eg your family is a commune
is the state in your family?
But you can't have wide spread communism
communes should be decentralized
I see your point but it still necessarily isn't communism
Communism must have a state.
anarchism was first used to describe libertarian socialism
But still communism must have a state
Karl Marx would agree
Anyway I have to go
karl marx isn't the founder of ancom
it's peter kropotkin
proudhon criticized marx
I know this
My point was to have true socialism or communism you must have a state
https://s3.superiorservers.co/forums/monthly_2020_10/Screenshot_20201023-122617_Chrome.thumb.jpg.c72317a50964e8ddb71189c2cee3c551.jpg
https://cdn.tanners.space/HcUV
https://cdn.tanners.space/Dn9R