Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 763063061564620831
it's to offend the left completely to keep them from voting period
well the insane left
the insane left technically want to throw out the constitution...and the bill of rights because it offends them..in favor of marxism/communism ...which falls under insurrection part of the constitutional laws in an attempt to overthrow the gov illegally in favor of communism which is a federal crime since the 1950's
i'm still pissed at the dems for killing https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/110/hr1955
every resident that grew up under communism tried to tell the insane left they're nuts for wanting it...it was a slave state system where everybody was a slave to the state with no rights period, u fight for ur rights..ur arrested and jailed if ur lucky..if ur not lucky, ur shot dead
would have no crazy marxist revolutionaries now.
i attribute the decline of our country starting in that lame duck session before obama.
it started yrs if not decades sooner
about 100yrs earlier....slow decline
true, i guess this is more the nail in the coffin
This is why they don't want parents in the classrooms with their kids https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AlTfUa8BpIo
anyway...before i go afk for a bit, if the great depression was any longer, usa would be communist by 1940's
and rest of the world by 1945
europe woulda went down faster..way faster
guess who was there to stop europe from going communist
it wasn't usa
> well technically it was national, not state level...the state can bitch but they can't stop national constitutional laws
@Deleted User from what I know the 14th amendment applies the constitution and bill of rights to the states. Wouldn’t this mean that the establishment clause and free exercise clause apply to the states also?
states can establish their own laws for their own states but what they can not do is violate existing national laws in those legal systems of their own states in violation of the constitution and bill of rights
they can take a constitutionally passed law on national level and make local amendments to it to expand it, but not make amendments to it in order to limit it
and ppl wonder why oregan too so long to become a state, they had a zero black ppl clause in their territory constitution
Ok I understand that but states attempted to institute a religion before and were stopped because it was unconstitutional
took them a while to track down everything to remove it
well if the religion's practices were unconstitutional..then it's a valid reason
say like human sacrificing and human slavery
That’s also grounds for restricting a religion. What happened then is some states endorsed one religion over the other for no secular reason and that is unconstitutional
So they were stopped
i seriously think satanism will have to get a serious legal team together in the future if they want to practice rituals that take human lives they do so on the grounds of legal agreements of the person being sacrificed with impartial witnesses so no constitutional rights nor human rights are being violated
well i pretty much think some changes will go into effect in various states over the next few yrs if not decades to clarify these positions on religion and establishment of such
> well i pretty much think some changes will go into effect in various states over the next few yrs if not decades to clarify these positions on religion and establishment of such
@Deleted User where is the original article we were discussing?
about an hr or so back
Ok I went to look for it and didn’t find it
well u kinda jumped into a discussion between me and another
we kinda splintered off the main article a bit
Was it the affirmative action?
ya
Ahhhh okok
I was mistaken to even jump in there oog, my bad
Thought y’all were talking about state endorsed religion like the fool that I am
ok, this here is nearly identical to the national constitutional bill into law creation ...except during 'covid lockdown', where it would be illegal to do so if they tried to pass a law without public review first