Message from @Dank_Furry_Pirate

Discord ID: 784546466008924200


2020-12-04 22:20:13 UTC  

All those old people though.

2020-12-04 22:20:19 UTC  

And overseas military.

2020-12-04 22:20:50 UTC  

pa's election laws are more strict ...any election laws changes need general election vote, not completely state legislature

2020-12-04 22:20:52 UTC  

Shit all military really.

2020-12-04 22:21:30 UTC  

I don’t think the GA SOS will go for the new audit.

2020-12-04 22:21:57 UTC  

Kemp is a fraud who is just saying it out loud to make voters happy.

2020-12-04 22:22:02 UTC  

GA SOS = Stinks Of Swamp

2020-12-04 22:22:18 UTC  

so on pa election law states that any election law changes must be voted on first by state legislature first, then decided by the general population of the state in a general election..and only come into effect in the next election yr cycle, not current one

2020-12-04 22:23:13 UTC  

<#760648730431979560> please

2020-12-04 22:24:13 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/730962163098976346/784545625169199144/unknown.png

2020-12-04 22:24:27 UTC  

Wait what?!?!

2020-12-04 22:24:31 UTC  

The SCOTUS?!?

2020-12-04 22:24:34 UTC  

i just saw it myself

2020-12-04 22:25:04 UTC  

about 2 hours ago

2020-12-04 22:25:07 UTC  

The USSC already said PA is good.

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/730962163098976346/784545851770404914/image0.png

2020-12-04 22:25:59 UTC  

pa violated it's own state's constitution by doing that

2020-12-04 22:26:08 UTC  

Yes

2020-12-04 22:26:48 UTC  

when the state sc agreed to go along with it, it clearly showed the corruption and bias of the state sc

2020-12-04 22:27:26 UTC  

No that’s the United States Supreme Court ruling.

2020-12-04 22:27:33 UTC  

state sc are elected, not appointed and screened to prove their worthiness to represent the state's constitution

2020-12-04 22:28:13 UTC  

well some ppl have to be baited in

2020-12-04 22:28:37 UTC  

There are suits launched to the SCOTUS by PA Republicans

2020-12-04 22:29:10 UTC  

most national sc appointees aren't fully versed in each state's own constitution when it comes to election laws and this clearly proves it

2020-12-04 22:29:11 UTC  

So if the head SC said it’s fine, it’s fine. They won’t take a case after the election saying “well we didn’t like this either” when they had time before the election to make a case against it.

2020-12-04 22:29:46 UTC  

let me guess, roberts

2020-12-04 22:30:08 UTC  

roberts has been a rino for a while

2020-12-04 22:30:17 UTC  

That would open elections years later to be done the same way. The losing party could just say fuck that and go to a friendly Supreme Court every time.

2020-12-04 22:30:24 UTC  

You don’t want that.

2020-12-04 22:30:39 UTC  

I don't know what exactly they're at the SC for

2020-12-04 22:31:01 UTC  

I'll post if there's any updates or that post of mine was completely bunk

2020-12-04 22:32:17 UTC  

Alito expects a word from them by the 9th

2020-12-04 22:32:30 UTC  

And there is no reports of results changing

2020-12-04 22:33:53 UTC  

that prob wont happen being the trump campaign say that have clear evidence of voter fraud, if we let this continue then republican's will never win. If trump wins i would like him to do a overhaul on the election

2020-12-04 22:34:13 UTC  

As far as what I have read, the small amount of ballots received after the election has still not even been counted.

2020-12-04 22:34:30 UTC  

In Pa

2020-12-04 22:34:39 UTC  

Recieved

2020-12-04 22:34:41 UTC  

Sounds fishy

2020-12-04 22:34:43 UTC  

In accordance to what Alito ordered.

2020-12-04 22:35:07 UTC  

Well the post office was running a little slow before the election. It’s bound to happen no?

2020-12-04 22:35:32 UTC  

And again. They haven’t even been added to the count yet.