alot of blind too

some awake

and anybody that works for the city is suspect of being corrupt

Any legislature picks electors based on election results. Would need a revote.

Designate NYC police enforcing COVID lockdowns as Oathbreakers.

Or rather any police.

well limited martial law is the only safe recourse ...this ensures no cheating on revote and all constitutional election laws are applied ...even the state ones done before any 'mail-in' changes were created

election laws cannot be changed in any election yr ...federal election laws

So no mail in this time?

nope

All those old people though.

And overseas military.

pa's election laws are more strict ...any election laws changes need general election vote, not completely state legislature

Shit all military really.

I don’t think the GA SOS will go for the new audit.

Kemp is a fraud who is just saying it out loud to make voters happy.

GA SOS = Stinks Of Swamp

so on pa election law states that any election law changes must be voted on first by state legislature first, then decided by the general population of the state in a general election..and only come into effect in the next election yr cycle, not current one

<#760648730431979560> please

https://twitter.com/amuse/status/1334964234447413252

Wait what?!?!

The SCOTUS?!?

i just saw it myself

about 2 hours ago

The USSC already said PA is good.

pa violated it's own state's constitution by doing that

Yes

when the state sc agreed to go along with it, it clearly showed the corruption and bias of the state sc

No that’s the United States Supreme Court ruling.

state sc are elected, not appointed and screened to prove their worthiness to represent the state's constitution

well some ppl have to be baited in

There are suits launched to the SCOTUS by PA Republicans

most national sc appointees aren't fully versed in each state's own constitution when it comes to election laws and this clearly proves it

So if the head SC said it’s fine, it’s fine. They won’t take a case after the election saying “well we didn’t like this either” when they had time before the election to make a case against it.

let me guess, roberts

roberts has been a rino for a while

That would open elections years later to be done the same way. The losing party could just say fuck that and go to a friendly Supreme Court every time.

You don’t want that.

I don't know what exactly they're at the SC for

I'll post if there's any updates or that post of mine was completely bunk