Message from @Zilla

Discord ID: 786659834257997875


2020-12-10 18:06:47 UTC  

Sidney Powell 🇺🇸⭐⭐⭐ (@SidneyPowell1) Tweeted:
It must!
We had massive foreign money and #CyberAttack on our election.
We have it all now!
@realDonaldTrump
Trigger all aspects of your #ExecutiveOrder
@POTUS
@Scavino45
@GenFlynn
@LLinWood
@KrakenWood
@kraken_wood https://twitter.com/SidneyPowell1/status/1337086968912617472?s=20

2020-12-10 18:07:28 UTC  

big brain to reveal your next move in leftist hell\

2020-12-10 18:07:29 UTC  

Bro what she on about

2020-12-10 18:08:32 UTC  

kemp deal with china for dominion voting machines

2020-12-10 18:09:04 UTC  

couldnt he ask for help from a smaller

2020-12-10 18:09:12 UTC  

more descret

2020-12-10 18:09:14 UTC  

country

2020-12-10 18:09:44 UTC  

dominion voting machines are a canadian co

2020-12-10 18:10:17 UTC  

secure elections means nothing made nor invested from outside the usa

2020-12-10 18:11:45 UTC  

the us defense systems were supposed to be exclusively american made prior 1990's ...it got screwy between then and when trump took office, now returning to pure exclusive defense tech made in usa

2020-12-10 18:12:20 UTC  

dominion machines have more trouble deciding their nationality than kamala harris

2020-12-10 18:12:31 UTC  

this matters even in the election system ...has to be military secure to be an effective system without corruption

2020-12-10 18:13:21 UTC  

yes. we cant allow random nobodys to be counting the ballots. we need mature trustworthy people who have sworn an oath

2020-12-10 18:13:35 UTC  

f-22's are not allowed to be sold, they're exclusively made in america with american parts, but we can sell the f-35's ...american made, israel designed, and china built parts

2020-12-10 18:14:45 UTC  

we need ppl that need to know the consquences of their actions if they go treasonous against the usa once they swear in to that oath

2020-12-10 18:15:33 UTC  

anybody could take a bribe and not know it ...but not everybody can make a treasonous act happen

2020-12-10 18:23:57 UTC  

thats why the f-35 sucks. its our 5th generation whore <:thinking:726878987837636698>

2020-12-10 18:24:22 UTC  

its a good airplane probably, but i am not a pilot so i wouldnt know

2020-12-10 18:24:27 UTC  

the f-22 is much better

2020-12-10 18:25:07 UTC  

but the older jets are better <:aTomcat:609605928399929344> <:aHornet:609606174815289347> <:aHarrier:609607118739341316> <:aBRRRRRT:609607098040320000>

2020-12-10 18:25:19 UTC  

The F-35 is good, but is a fairly underwealming aircraft due to being deisgned to fit so many different roles

2020-12-10 18:25:47 UTC  

i think it looks kinda gross

2020-12-10 18:26:12 UTC  

kinda reminds me of a chode

2020-12-10 18:28:11 UTC  

Missouri, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina, and Utah

2020-12-10 18:28:26 UTC  

They have filed to intervene as plaintiffs

2020-12-10 18:31:41 UTC  

How can I get updates on how many states are in on the suit?

2020-12-10 18:31:48 UTC  

And more

2020-12-10 18:47:02 UTC  

Either the SCOTUS website or thedonald.win

2020-12-10 19:02:19 UTC  

What is the precedent for suing another state? I’d think the constitution frowns on something like this tbh. (What would then prevent states suing over other states rights issues?) I LOVE the idea of more states coming on board with the challenge, but I am concerned this is rino activities in some part. This whole time we’ve said “why aren’t the republicans fighting back?” And then this crops up. I’m just wondering how many are in it to save their own skin.

2020-12-10 19:04:25 UTC  

There are 6 states on the suit vs GA, PA, MI and WI

2020-12-10 19:04:26 UTC  

The case the held the individual mandate to be unconstitutional was between California and Texas.

2020-12-10 19:04:39 UTC  

in this specific case? the cheating states changed their election laws in the eleventh hour and treating their state's vote different than the votes of the rest of the Union, thus violating the Equal Voter Protection Clause.

2020-12-10 19:05:20 UTC  

But each state can have their own election rules, no? Like Texas has voter ID I believe- bu lt colorado doesn’t.

2020-12-10 19:06:48 UTC  

Well, theoretically yes. And the case doesn't argue that they can't. However, state's must follow their own laws that are on the books and only those with the power granted to them may change the election rules. In many of these states, it wasn't the state legislature changing their state law for election rules.

2020-12-10 19:07:18 UTC  

Ok - that is a really good point.

2020-12-10 19:07:48 UTC  

Bc it wasn’t the legislature changing the rules of the election. That has to be shown as unconstitutional

2020-12-10 19:08:12 UTC  

I hope the people who have standing for that are the ones bringing it forward.

2020-12-10 19:08:45 UTC  

http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/PROJECTS/FTRIALS/conlaw/righttovote.html
Here is something that discusses legal precedent concerning the Equal Voter Protection Clause.

2020-12-10 19:09:03 UTC  

also Georgia's executive branch created laws at the last second, which ***only the legislatures have the sole authority to write new laws***