But what about the people who filed the the sworn affidavits in those said swing states? Does that not count for something? I'm not a lawyer by any means or understand this anyway, but that sounds like something that could get it there.

actually, Texas does have legal reason. the reason why the case was thrown out was due to technicallity errors that Texas is able to fix and resubmit to the Supreme Court, the fight with Texas is far from over

PA legislature might go on SCOTUS i think
They have injury

constitution got violated

yep....and the citizens that took civics in pa know it

alright thanks 🙂

i kept telling locals to vote in person, not mail in ballot

do not listen to what the media is trying to say, they want it to look like the entirety of Texas's case was invalidated and completely thrown out. they are doing this to drive our moral low

from this tweet
https://twitter.com/Raiklin/status/1337568063567376384?s=20

White-Pill: Texas is STILL in the game, all they have to do is re-appeal the lawsuit to ensure it fits with Article III.

Just like what Sidney Powell did with her Kraken suit with another reason it was denied before.

There's always the...*ahem*....nuclear option, if you catch my drift.

Indeed

Ah yes, The Japanese Shower. 🙂

Ok, so the Court said TX did not have 'standing', as they weren't injured. But PA was. So, it seems PA is the state to file this and their legislative branch already seems willing. (Edited for clarity.)

What the fuck? I go and have drinks with my wife and the fuckin sky falls?

so SC declined to hear Texas case

now what?

I... Did not expect this. Wtf! Why the hell did scotus betray us?

so many chicken littles... watch this
https://discord.com/channels/707691030748594288/730962163098976346/787126036516700190

I stated this here also, Texas still has a chance. @Nightenhelser
https://discord.com/channels/707691030748594288/730962163098976346/787140612565630996

Is anyone able to confirm if Trump invoked the article 9? I’m not seeing a lot of places reporting on it but I saw one article above in chat saying he did

Even Trump is upset with the developments
https://twitter.com/maggieNYT/status/1337571309266538496?s=19

Maggie is pretty maga friendly

The article 9 link that somebody posted here was a satire site

Or at least when I looked at it the site declared that it was a satire site

Article 9 = insurrection?

No its fake it was a copy paste article from another site that has the excat words and that article that im talking about was published on August 19 2020

Btw TX lawsuit need to find an injury as i understood
Nothing say they can't fill it back

I am VERY disappointed in scotus. Trump's own justices voted against him

Texas case is still in play, it just has to be reworded to fit Article 3 of the Constitution so the Supreme Court can hear it and rule on it

And add more details.

How was there NOT injury? The 4 states cheating hurt Texas

thats the only reason they voted no

If texas convbice PA legislature to go to SCOTUS its good

so are you saying there is a chance of winning

This is saying that its not because of Texas but the little understanding of Article 3 of the constitution, if Texas AG rewords it, the SCOTUS could possibly accept case.

Supreme Court isn't sure they have jurisdiction over this.

That was why they backed out

i think they need to go to federal court