<:PenceApplauding:763421626062209034>

Including Hawaii? And DC (which I realize isn’t and shouldn’t be a state)?

Dude, that's exactly what I'm reading about now.

https://www.lawofficer.com/michigan-state-police-arrest-democratic-official-six-felony-charges-election-fraud/

This is going to make some stomachs sink

bloody, 'el.

This good or bad?

Very good

Unless she didn't commit election fraud, which I highly doubt

Says she did. In 2018.

About right length for a criminal investigation

https://youtu.be/T1hZj1x2UMk

Honestly it seems over
I know they divided texas lawsuit in lower lawsuit
But seems sketchy

https://twitter.com/CodeMonkeyZ/status/1338248185198727168

Is there lawsuit in all the needed state ?
Or did the dismissal of the one of GA by the SC of GA killed hope in GA?

Like idk how in GA they don't see the evidence of fraud

each of the 4 states are caught with fraud ..but each with a different kind of fraud ...so each case must be handled differently, not as a whole for all the states involved

@Pal3Rid3r wtf is gitmo lmaoo

How did they loose in GA? Its the most obvious
Did they show the video?

military prison based in cuba

And they looses in circuit court in WI

They can just appeal it, they are prohibed to do another one of the style

Weird how we own a little sliver of cuba

I wonder what’s the history behind that

well constitutional election laws have to be interpreted properly for each case, texas lawsuit was broadband against 4 separate cases...not defining to each case except for the fraud ....it has to be more fine tuned to each case involved for sc to even look at it

TX was not dismissed on merit but lack of standing
So they didnt look the proof

Since the problem with the Texas case is that Texas doesn’t have ground to argue it

It has to be an offended party

Like trump or the legislature

It’s a future vacation spot for a lot of people. Permanent vacation. 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

discrediting the value of other states isn't enough of a standing for the sc

Yeah I know it’s bs

Oh

It should definitely be fixed after this though

the problem is texas needs a more seasoned constitutional legal team to argue this

Yes

The TX case is good. They just need to re word it. It’s solid.

Texas probably would have gotten it if they had a constitutional scholar look over it

one of the sc appointees was from texas..that didn't get selected to be sworn in

But besides that the argument is gold