?

so does this mean

biden will take care of the riots

I am going to jail

since it says

extremism

probably just means they'll censor every trump supporter since we're "racist"

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/biden-first-executive-orders-measures/2020/11/07/9fb9c1d0-210b-11eb-b532-05c751cd5dc2_story.html?outputType=amp

Let the hell scape begin

Come on

https://www.sltrib.com/news/politics/2020/09/18/theres-speculation-that/

OH HELL NOOOOO!!!!

Millennial Millie was digging around and found Mitt Romney had ties to one of the election counting companies that are doing fraud

Mother fucker should be thrown in the slammer

In 2018, Romney requested for Trump's endorsement and received it to win a senate seat in Utah. Now, we see him gnawing back at the president.

yeah Romney is still mad that Trump kicked Hillary's @$$ and he couldn't beat Obama

Spineless Cuck

WOOOOOOO

WOOOOOO <:CrazyAOC:720122172470722570>

I would love to not have her in office again!

If trump pulls through the meltdowns are going to be amazing.

I really hope he does win the courts because that seems to be the theme of 2020. Courts prevailing above the mob.

They say Al Gore got to be president elect for 37 days. Imagine how high Biden supporters and Trump haters will be by then. It's a long way to fall if SCOTUS clips their wings.

yes indeed. They should not be celebrating and shame on the media for misinforming them. This is why I'm calling them the mob.

Their coedependency to MSM can and will be their downfall.

Let's not forget the fact that these people forgot that the virus is still there

They thought that , when biden "won" the virus is over

If he does become president, I wanna see how he handles the spike of covid patients

Meanwhile the media gaslights them with misinformation while the rest of the planet is
rising for their own liberties. The free nation taking freedom for granted.

I have to ask is that "task force" thing even constitutional?

no it's not, if they use American Library association V US department of justice and reno V the ACLU

in a 9-0 decision they ruled speech on the internet was entitled to the highest levels of first amendment protections similar to what is granted to books and news papers

not even sworn in and is going to get into fights with the supreme court

https://www.dailywire.com/news/aoc-fumes-whites-need-anti-racist-training-democrats-need-to-embrace-far-left-or-theyll-lose?%3Futm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=dwtwitter

yeah the right needs a civil liberties group

R.A.V. v. St. Paul, 505 U.S. 377, 112 S.Ct. 2538, 120 L.Ed.2d. 305 (1992): St. Paul, Minnesota passed an ordinance that banned "hate speech," any expression, such as a burning cross or swastika, that might arouse anger, alarm, or resentment in others on the basis of race, color, religion, or gender. The Supreme Court struck the ordinance down as unconstitutionally discriminating based on the content of expression: the law banned only fighting words that insult based on race, religion, or gender, while abusive invective aimed at someone on the basis of political affiliation or sexual orientation would be permissible. The law thus reflected only the city's special hostility towards certain biases and not others, which is what the First Amendment forbids.

could use this as well

its not hate speech if its against white people or spoken from a "POC"

cause only white people can be racist hurr durr

supreme court doesn't do that, least it shouldn't

depends on how deep the leftist bs has gotten