Message from @qwerty_π
Discord ID: 786874174978654228
Of course theyβd do that, they shove their ideals down our throats and itβs repulsive
please please please π
Looks like i gotta move out of commie country now before it starts
I wouldn't call connecticut commie
I swear CT could flip if we actually had republican politicians
Virginia would still only be at like 12% of its historical size
? they still have enough wealthy people?
How about we take a large sum of the salary of these politicians
Term limits and lower pay
They should be given a house and the according necessities and then a small sum of money from the taxes. Not the hundreds of thousands of dollars they're given.
agree
I would also like to add tax free BUT they have to have all their wealth trackable.
Michigan, Pennsylvania State Lawmakers Ask Supreme Court to Join Texas Election Lawsuit
https://link.theepochtimes.com/mkt_app/michigan-pennsylvania-state-lawmakers-ask-supreme-court-to-join-texas-election-lawsuit_3613784.html
Download our app to read more for free at https://ept.ms/DownloadApp
39 States Pick Sides in Texas Supreme Court Election Challenge
https://link.theepochtimes.com/mkt_app/39-states-pick-sides-in-texas-supreme-court-election-challenge_3613618.html
Michigan eh? Nice.
So 39 states have sided with texas in this lawsuit
The civil war seems very one sided
Not that I want one
I suppose you aren't aware that it is not 39 states that are siding with Texas, but 39 states have picked a side. 20 states and 3 territories have joined the 4 states being sued by Texas, as in they are openly defending corruption and fraud! https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/12/breaking-now-democrat-attorneys-general-align-pennsylvania-michigan-wisconsin-georgia-nearly-every-state-picked-sides/
21 states have sided with Texas, 24 states and 3 territories (who dont have a legal pot to piss in) have sided against texas.
So are we losing?
Imagine if these blue states decide to secede and these red states just embargo all transport of goods between the two sides. lol.
The blue states can't cook
They cook in da microwave
The number of states is irrelevant really
Its PR only
the supreme court turned down the case
says "states can how elections how they want" and stuff like that
That is a pretty stupid rule
If we are a unified nation, why do we all have seperate rules for running the presidental election?
We honestly need an amendment to the constitution saying that all states participating in presidental elections, or anything federal where all states participate (excluding house, senate, and local races) must use a predetermined set of rules, so there are no more of these controversies ever again
If anyone proposed that, no matter the party, I would vote for them
I don't want to deal with this garbage
Elections are performed by the states. We don't want to open a can of worms with that. Interestingly, most have forgotten that the SCOTUS threw out a multi state suit led by Oklahoma and Nebraska against Colorado's weed legalization. Hearing the case would violate state sovereignty among themselves, and thus the suit was thrown out. This current ruling is within perfect legal precedence
There are solutions, namely actually enforcing the laws we have. 99.99% of the time that covers the "need for new laws"