Message from @SPRTNWRRYR1974
Discord ID: 794279631518957588
lol
also if that school has cameras, it negates the 'privacy' section of that law because there is no privacy when theres cameras in the building
therefore it was legal for the child to record
Schools have a "No Phone" Policy
no phone policy <:dogekek:726878872607653918> nobody is going to ever take these kids phones away from them
Well she is both in the wrong and the right
And a no phone policy is that she can't have her phone out or on at least if it's on then keep it on silent
The teachers can take the phone away if they hear or see it till a parent comes and gets it
lol alrighty
@Dank_Furry_Pirate: Schools and Teachers recieve their funding (school funding and teacher salaries) from Federal and State (and possibly local) taxes. This, by definition, makes them Public Employees, just like police. They have no right to "Expectation of Privacy". Period. Just thought I'd point that out to you.
I assume that only applies to public schools since as far as I know private schools do not have the same funding (if they do I have problems with that, but that’s another issue). Not disputing your point, as it makes sense. Just clarrifying something for myself.
I have a revolutionary and radical solution to that; teach your kids yourself.
@StoryGirl83, yes, I was referring to Public schools. I believe that many "Private" schools also recieve some Federal funding as well, but I am not certain of that point, nor would I know which ones do vs don't. As a side note: I believe that ALL Colleges in the US recieve Federal (and in the case of Oklahoma, State) funding as well as private funding via donations and tuition. I live in Oklahoma and know that our colleges (OU, OSU, and others) recieve State funding. I don't know about other States. There is something in the Oklahoma State Constitution that when an Oklahoma College recieves a private donation, the State must match that donation in ADDITION to the College's normal State budget.
This became problematic when, a number of years ago, T. Boon Pickins donated several hundred million to OSU at one time. Imagine all that in Taxpayer money having to be diverted just because of that clause. There was a HUGE clamor about it throughout the State.
gee, i wonder why
Seems like McConnell is still on our side, hopefully he remains backing Trump
How many pages is the bill?
Interesting. I attended a college in Iowa which was unaccredited and I’m fairly confident that even if they had been offered federal funds, they wouldn’t have taken them. They have since closed their doors (after 60+ years) due to a low interest in the physical college. They may still have online courses, but as the school was never about the degrees, they no longer offer those. To give you an idea of why I am confident they wouldn’t have taken federal funds, the teachers did not accept salaries and the entire cost for my four years there was around $6,000, the first year’s worth I paid nothing of due to a scholarship from the school. This included the cost of staying in the dorm.
voter fraud is illegal voters
I would imagine there are very few if any other schools like that in the US.
illegals voting, ppl not living where they're supposed to be at, and even the dead voting
election fraud/corruption is a whole another matter consider it's treason
He's trying to save face imo
Also repealing Section 230 is throwing the baby out with the bathwater, the better solution is to take out the part that allows censorship and keep the rest
They literally apologized after idiot
i'm with salty on this one though, they apologized but didn't do anything to the person who sent the tweet. if they were truly apologetic they would show that it's not appropriate behavior for their employees
actions speak louder than words
I've stayed clear of Walmart since mid 2000's after I found out they have ties with the Clinton s. The Walton family is cut from the same mold.
didnt you guys know filming inside a hospital is illegal