Message from @Book
Discord ID: 774474018991767553
I just see which one aligns with my beliefs the most
.warn @ThyDoctor rule one, you may have qualms with Christianity, but gives no excuse for insults and attacking ones faith
yes
The song of victory the Lord says it is done. Trump 2020
let's move it here guys
OK.
lol
I didn't have much else to say as of now, but you can ping me if you got any questions or responses.
@isoboto Response to your thing in election discussions. I know, that's stupid that they can.
Hell, I'm not even a regular Christian. I don't denominate myself to a specific type of christianity like Evangelic or Baptist
Not a catholic either
I'm a non-denominational Christian
meaning I just simply follow the bible, have a relationship with God, and stay faithfully by his side
Hi guys
@kendikane88 also ngl, didn't take u for religious...
> @kendikane88 also ngl, didn't take u for religious...
@Book huh?
replying to me
and I was like "Wait you're religious"
infact I didn't think anyone here was religious
Oh what did I say?
1 sec
> that is a lie of the devil! That is the first trick he used on eve to get her to sin in the first place. He said “that’s not what God really said, is it?” Meaning that if she ate of the fruit of the tree of knowledge she would die. He twisted Gods words and convinced eve to sin. It is incredible how he keeps using that same tactic and it keeps working. Look into things for yourself. Don’t just believe things because you think a careful mind is a skeptical one. The Bible asks us to believe some fantastic things. So it is easier sometimes to not believe it than to read it for yourself and gain true understanding.
that
> @TheSynical1 Of course it's not (jumping to conclusions is not good for civil discourse), but you asked if "thou shall not kill" applies to animals when it clearly doesn't.
@MechaKnuckles
How do you know? It’s doesn’t say thou shalt not kill humans. And yes, eat the flesh of the animal, but you didn’t eat the spider, so does that violate the law? It’s says not to lust for another mans wife as well, but I’m sure you’ve watched explicit videos of an actress who’s married. So did you violate that law? You’ve definitely done something your parents have told you not to do, so did you violate that law? You see what I’m saying? Everyone is free to make their own, personal interpretations.
You don't have to take everything literally
That's how we know
> @MechaKnuckles
>
> How do you know? It’s doesn’t say thou shalt not kill humans. And yes, eat the flesh of the animal, but you didn’t eat the spider, so does that violate the law? It’s says not to lust for another mans wife as well, but I’m sure you’ve watched explicit videos of an actress who’s married. So did you violate that law? You’ve definitely done something your parents have told you not to do, so did you violate that law? You see what I’m saying? Everyone is free to make their own, personal interpretations.
@TheSynical1 it says though shall not commit murder. Depending on what translation you look at.
I kill bugs all the time anyways
I just use NKJV and KJV and NASB
> It’s says not to lust for another mans wife as well, but I’m sure you’ve watched explicit videos of an actress who’s married. So did you violate that law?
I don't watch pornography but yes that's what the verse would imply.
KJV says not commit murder
Sounds about right
I’m just saying, a book written by man, correct? And, man in inherently flawed, correct? So it would be egregious to think that the book wouldn’t be flawed. Especially after thousands of years of additions and redactions.
@kendikane88 Sure, but the context is important. And with context we know it's about not killing one another.
> @kendikane88 Sure, but the context is important. And with context we know it's about not killing one aother.
@MechaKnuckles yes I agree
The book can be flawed....but like..damn how do I put this into words