> they all want to establish a stateless, moneyless and classless society?
@米饭和面条 1. technically, you can't function in a stateless society -- you will still have a government controlling and distributing the stuff (because otherwise who will enforce the rules?). the government role may be reduced to something smaller into local leaders/government -- but historically that's not what happens. but. i digress.
2. secondly, you can't eliminate money or class. money is deemed a value of labour -- you'll have to go back pure on trading raw objects or pure labour, ie. a log of wood for some rice, or a log of wood for 1 hour of service. Which then brings the question of whether you can afford to trade it or provide the desirable goods/service. some simply do not have the ability to do that.
3. a classless society is also impossible. again, historically speaking -- greed is a real monster and states that operate under "communism" still have the richest people being so wealthy far beyond the lowly grunts. it also brings to mind, what separate the classes? and how do we help people advance from the lower class to the next?
