well. there you go. you're assuming we can reach the same ending point by giving "equal" opportunity -- which is almost impossible. even comparing siblings, you'd have maybe only 50% of the time the siblings have the same exact life pathway and/or career (assuming they're similar in personalities, etc.)
I didnt know how to word it other than equal opportunity since no matter how things are, that isnt possible. People can reach the same end goal but one will have a easier time than another
Also I wansnt saying that there will be equal outcomes, there will be different outcomes. I was using a sernerio if someone wants to be a certain profession and they have 2 different socialmclasses
It's getting there that's the hard part. In Australia a student with private education is more likely to get the means to obtain a high ATAR to enter University, because they have the means to afford a better education. The person in a public school who can't go to school everyday will have less of a chance to obtain this high ATAR, simply because they don't have as strong of a start. This ultimately holds an influence over their ability to obtain the same job.
sure. but "equal" is implying similar or the same chances given to a person, right? it also depends on how you define "opportunity". would someone taking on ANY jobs and every job and work your way up and saving money be consider having the same amount/number of opportunity as someone who cherry-pick their job so they work in the a specialized area? i'd say no (and i'm not making a judgement whether which opportunity is better)
sure. but it also depends on how you present yourself, no? a person with degree that fumbles or unable to do a good interview might not get the job, comparing to the one without, yet have a slick/smooth, charismatic interview
Then that's adding another variable to the mix. I try to keep things as simple as possible. If one did have more work experience, then it depends on the job.
